GNU bug report logs - #61412
[PATCH] Add inlay hints to eglot

Previous Next

Full log

Message #26 received at 61412 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Chinmay Dalal <dalal.chinmay.0101 <at> gmail.com>, 61412 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#61412: Hover github discussion
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:05:13 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 1:58 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Chinmay Dalal <dalal.chinmay.0101 <at> gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 21:05:12 +0530
> >
> >
> > From the discussion on github
> > https://github.com/joaotavora/eglot/discussions/963
> >
> > > The default version would be a hoverable symbol that shows something
> in the echo area when you mouse hover over it.
> >
> >
> > > Let's continue in the bug tracker discussion initiated by your bug
> report.
> > > As far as I understand, inlay hints will show the type of many visible
> expressions at once, so it's different from the "hover" scenario.
> >
> > Yes, so it is impossible to use mouse hover for this as you can only
> > hover on one thing at once, right?
>

Yes.  I haven't  looked at your code, but my expectation is for inlay hints
to
activate either on a timer after each change, or by the explicit request of
the user via a keybinding.

It simply doesn't make sense to use mouse hover for this because the
hover mechanic is for a single text and inlay hints are about overlaying
multiple pieces of information in multiple locations of the buffer.

João, could you please look into this?
>

Hi Eli, this is about the "inlay hints" feature.

It's on the radar, but I don't have time in the very near future
to handle this.

I seem to recall that recently you voiced some opinion in another
bug report that this feature could be handled by a separate library
instead of a custom Eglot-only implementation.  This could be
quite reasonable -- or it could  be overkill/overengeering.  Only a look
at the pros and cons of this implementation can tell that, and I haven't
had time, sorry.

Anyway, if there is indeed a separate discussion for this, then the
two discussions should be merged.  Be sure to keep me in the loop
if you can as I am overwhelmed with other activies in the moment
and am not scanning the bug-tracker, or even emacs-devel, for
Eglot-related emails at the moment.

João

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.