GNU bug report logs - #61403
30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug?

Previous Next

Full log

Message #26 received at 61403 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
Cc: 61403 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, casouri <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#61403: 30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug?
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 15:04:41 +0200

> From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
> Cc: casouri <at> gmail.com,  61403 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 20:36:22 +0800
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > Maybe so, but not for this case: I see absolutely no reason to
> > "de-fontify" TEST_STATIC here, as it is part of the type.
> 
> It actually ``static'' on TEST builds or nothing at all, not part of the
> type.

The above actually means that it _is_ part of the type.

> It ought not to be fontified, just as we don't fontify _Noreturn
> or __attribute__ as types.

In 'static char', "static" is part of the type.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.