Subject: bug#61403: 30.0.50; C tree-sitter bug?

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 15:04:41 +0200

> From: Po Lu <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked],  [email-masked]
> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 20:36:22 +0800
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:
> 
> > Maybe so, but not for this case: I see absolutely no reason to
> > "de-fontify" TEST_STATIC here, as it is part of the type.
> 
> It actually ``static'' on TEST builds or nothing at all, not part of the
> type.

The above actually means that it _is_ part of the type.

> It ought not to be fontified, just as we don't fontify _Noreturn
> or __attribute__ as types.

In 'static char', "static" is part of the type.