GNU bug report logs - #61400
Different filling for verbatim macros

Previous Next

Package: auctex;

Reported by: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>

Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 08:53:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
Subject: bug#61400: closed (Re: bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim
 macros)
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:51:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros

which was filed against the auctex package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 61400 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
61400: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61400
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
To: Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp>
Cc: 61400-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 13:50:13 +0100
Hi Keita,

Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp> writes:

> Done. I also changed
>             (skip-chars-forward (concat "^" delimiter)))
> to
>             (skip-chars-forward (concat "^" delimiter) (line-end-position)))

many thanks for fixing this issue.  I'm therefore closing this report.

Best, Arash

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
To: auctex-bugs <bug-auctex <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Different filling for verbatim macros
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 09:52:17 +0100
Hi all,

please set `TeX-parse-self' to t and load this small file:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{fvextra}

\begin{document}

Now we can write some text foo and \path{bar}

Now we can write some text foo and \path|bar|

Now we can write some text foo and \Verb|bar|

Now we can write some text foo and \Verb{bar}

Now we can write some text foo and \verb|bar|

\end{document}

%%% Local Variables:
%%% mode: latex
%%% TeX-master: t
%%% fill-column: 40
%%% End:
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Now mark the five lines and hit 'M-q'.  I get:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage{fvextra}

\begin{document}

Now we can write some text foo
and \path{bar}

Now we can write some text foo
and \path|bar|

Now we can write some text foo
and \Verb|bar|

Now we can write some text foo
and \Verb{bar}

Now we can write some text foo and
\verb|bar|

\end{document}

%%% Local Variables:
%%% mode: latex
%%% TeX-master: t
%%% fill-column: 40
%%% End:
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Any idea what the reason is for the different break points?  This is
with Emacs 30 (emacs -Q) and latest AUCTeX from Git.

TIA.  Best, Arash



This bug report was last modified 2 years and 156 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.