GNU bug report logs - #61400
Different filling for verbatim macros

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
To: Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp>
Cc: 61400 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>
Subject: bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 12:18:31 +0100

Hi Keita,

Ikumi Keita <ikumi <at> ikumi.que.jp> writes:

> I realized that multiple players are involved in this issue.

First of all, many thanks for your (as always) precise analysis 🙏🏿

> We can fix this inconsistency by the following code:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> (defun LaTeX-verbatim-macro-boundaries ()
> [...]
>       ;; Search backwards for the macro start, unless we are facing one
>       (if (looking-at (concat (regexp-quote TeX-esc) verbatim-regexp))
>           (forward-char 1)
>         (catch 'found
> [...]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> With this fix, `LaTeX-current-verbatim-macro' returns sane result even
> when the point is just before "\verb". It just behave like
> `TeX-current-macro'.

I think this should be our course of action: Make
`LaTeX-current-verbatim-macro' and `TeX-current-macro' work identical.

> Yes, the behavior becomes coherent, but in the undesired direction. :-(

We should take that.

> For consistency, maybe we should modify `TeX-current-macro' and
> `LaTeX-current-verbatim-macro' so that they return nil when the point is
> just before the verbatim macro. However, I'm not yet sure whether such
> change brings about bad side effects.

I agree, we shouldn't touch `TeX-current-macro'.

> Perhaps the safe fix is to tweak `TeX-current-macro' and
> `LaTeX-current-verbatim-macro' so that they accept optional argument for
> use in `LaTeX-verbatim-p'?

Here is another idea: We don't use `LaTeX-verbatim-p' in
`fill-nobreak-predicate', but define two new functions, say
`LaTeX-verbatim-macro-arg-boundaries' and `LaTeX-verbatim-nobreak-p'.
The first one is carved out of `LaTeX-verbatim-macro-boundaries' and
returns the beginning and end positions of the argument, as the name
suggests.

And `LaTeX-verbatim-nobreak-p' does the following: Check if the possible
break point for filling is inside the range returned by
`LaTeX-verbatim-macro-arg-boundaries' and if
`LaTeX-current-verbatim-macro' on that point returns non-nil, then
inhibit break there (t value), otherwise allow brake (nil value.)

WDYT, does this make sense?

Best, Arash

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.