GNU bug report logs - #61400
Different filling for verbatim macros

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
To: Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 61400 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#61400: Different filling for verbatim macros
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 10:47:24 +0100

Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> \begin{document}
>>
>> Now we can write some text foo and \path{bar}
>>
>> Now we can write some text foo and \path|bar|
>>
>> Now we can write some text foo and \Verb|bar|
>>
>> Now we can write some text foo and \Verb{bar}
>>
>> Now we can write some text foo and \verb|bar|
>>
>> \end{document}
>
> The different break point is already suggested when evaluating
>
>   (LaTeX-fill-move-to-break-point (line-beginning-position))
>
> at the end of each line.  So that function is where to start edebugging.

Hi Tassilo,

thanks for pushing me into that again.  I did already but I missed
what's happening in that function directly in the first form:

  (fill-move-to-break-point linebeg)

It moves the point to different positions.  In the example above, put
point after \path{bar} and do:

  M-: (fill-move-to-break-point (line-beginning-position)) RET

and the point before and.  Now go after \verb|bar| and do the same, no
is point after and.  Can you reproduce this?

Best, Arash

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.