GNU bug report logs - #61391
[PATCH 0/6] Improvements to Icedove (icons, gexps, un-bundling)

Previous Next

Full log

Message #43 received at 61391-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com>
Cc: 61391-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Jonathan Brielmaier <jonathan.brielmaier <at> web.de>
Subject: Re: bug#61391: [PATCH 0/6] Improvements to Icedove (icons, gexps,
 un-bundling)
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 16:20:48 -0500

Hi,

Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com> writes:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> About the icedove/wayland package, that appears to be a solely a
>> wrapper, so I don't think the fix needs to be propagated there.
>
> Since it's a wrapper the original files aren't installed into the
> profile, only the files in the wrapper.  So if anyone wanted to look for
> icons at "lib/icedove/chrome/icons/default" they might be fine for the
> original package but not the wrapper.  The wrapper copies "share" in
> though so the icons you copy there will be found just fine.
>
> I was simply questioning if someone else would try to find the icons at
> "lib/icedove/chrome/icons/default and if they would be out of luck since
> they don't exist in the wrapper.
>
>>From what you're saying, it sounds like this isn't an issue at all
> because no-one cares about those icons.

Indeed, that's my understanding too.

> Also you might want to take a look at bug#61438 as someone is trying to
> update icedove.  Also, the reason I discovered this patch series is
> because I expereinced bug#61438 and wanted to see if anyone had a fix
> ;).

I see the above as been merged already, great!  And I'll have more
Icedove fixes coming that enables its language support.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.