GNU bug report logs -
#61391
[PATCH 0/6] Improvements to Icedove (icons, gexps, un-bundling)
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2023 16:20:48 -0500
with message-id <87bklxdzyn.fsf_-_ <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#61391: [PATCH 0/6] Improvements to Icedove (icons, gexps, un-bundling)
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #61391,
regarding [PATCH 0/6] Improvements to Icedove (icons, gexps, un-bundling)
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
61391: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61391
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi Guix,
This series improves our Icedove package a bit, unbundling NSS and producing
its icon so that it looks more tidy in GNOME or other desktop environments.
Thanks!
Maxim Cournoyer (6):
gnu: icedove-wayland: Use gexps.
gnu: Add nspr-next.
gnu: Add nss-next.
gnu: icedove: Unbundle NSS.
gnu: icedove: Use more gexps.
gnu: icedove: Install icons.
gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
gnu/packages/nss.scm | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
base-commit: d934f36096142257e192e3029895b3a054bf3537
--
2.39.1
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi,
Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith <at> outlook.com> writes:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> About the icedove/wayland package, that appears to be a solely a
>> wrapper, so I don't think the fix needs to be propagated there.
>
> Since it's a wrapper the original files aren't installed into the
> profile, only the files in the wrapper. So if anyone wanted to look for
> icons at "lib/icedove/chrome/icons/default" they might be fine for the
> original package but not the wrapper. The wrapper copies "share" in
> though so the icons you copy there will be found just fine.
>
> I was simply questioning if someone else would try to find the icons at
> "lib/icedove/chrome/icons/default and if they would be out of luck since
> they don't exist in the wrapper.
>
>>From what you're saying, it sounds like this isn't an issue at all
> because no-one cares about those icons.
Indeed, that's my understanding too.
> Also you might want to take a look at bug#61438 as someone is trying to
> update icedove. Also, the reason I discovered this patch series is
> because I expereinced bug#61438 and wanted to see if anyone had a fix
> ;).
I see the above as been merged already, great! And I'll have more
Icedove fixes coming that enables its language support.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 95 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.