GNU bug report logs -
#61350
Eglot over Tramp freezes with large project
Previous Next
Full log
Message #191 received at 61350 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com> writes:
Hi João,
>> > So maybe you meant:
>> >
>> > (while (accept-process-output p 0 nil t))
>> >
>> > as suggested in that section?
>>
>> That was my first idea as well. But tramp-accept-process-output itself is
>> called in a loop, so there's no difference in practice[1].
>
> Hmmm, I still don't think they are equivalent. In tramp-a-p-o with
> TIMEOUT set to nil is where it normally hangs, right? Well then, if
> it does hang it will _not_ be called in a loop, by definition.
But the hang happens only when there is another process using the same
socket. As soon as such a parallel process is detected, my patch does
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(setq timeout (or timeout 0))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
No blocking anymore.
>> Pls give my patch testing, in order to see whether Tramp still blocks.
>
> I will do that later. But 10 out of 10 successes in your testing is
> a pretty solid indication that this is on the right track.
Thanks.
> João
Best regards, Michael.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 49 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.