GNU bug report logs - #61343
modules from channels is not available to "guix repl"

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>

Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 09:00:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 61574

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>, 61343 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>
Subject: bug#61343: [PATCH] scripts: repl: Load (gnu packages) to set up %load-path.
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:21:37 +0100
Hi Josselin,

To send my comment as v2, I did:

    git send-email --to="Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>"       \
        --to="Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>"                                        \
        --to="宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>"                                                         \
        --to="61343 <at> debbugs.gnu.org"                                                            \
        --cc="Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>"                                                \
        --in-reply-to="e0ffbcbb07fe41a04688223342461aa4d3310142.1676582046.git.dev <at> jpoiret.xyz" \
        v2-0001-scripts-repl-Extend-REPL-load-path-with-all-chann.patch

well, the keys ’cG’ from Emacs-Notmuch. ;-)

The issue is that it triggers a new issue number (that I have merged)
because of,

    "Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>"

Well, I am always confused by some Debbugs internals; I thought that
’in-reply-to’ would be enough to avoid the creation of a new issue.
Hum?

Therefore, my questions are: how do you reply?

And if someone could explain me: Why is Debbugs confused with this
remaining <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>?

Cheers,
simon




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 103 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.