GNU bug report logs - #6130
23.1; artist-mode spray-can malfunction

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
Cc: 6130 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, busk <at> lysator.liu.se, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, dk <at> danielkoning.com
Subject: bug#6130: 23.1; artist-mode spray-can malfunction
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:49:39 +0200

> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 10:08:45 +0100
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics <at> gmx.at>
> CC: monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, 6130 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, busk <at> lysator.liu.se
> 
>  > IOW, in Emacs one must read the documentation before they believe the
>  > literal meaning of an argument's name.
> 
> Unfortunately, in the case at hand the documentation was wrong and
> misleading

I agree.

> as most uses of `posn-window' still reflect.

I'm not sure.  It could be the case that most of those uses will never
get a frame from posn-window, in which case there's nothing wrong with
their current code.  The only way to tell is by analyzing the events
that are input to those code fragments.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.