GNU bug report logs - #61235
30.0.50; tree-sit: `treesit-node-check' lacks a way to tell if a node belongs to a deleted parser

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Mickey Petersen <mickey <at> masteringemacs.org>

Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 19:47:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 30.0.50

Fixed in version 29.1

Done: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #35 received at 61235 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 61235 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, mickey <at> masteringemacs.org
Subject: Re: bug#61235: 30.0.50; tree-sit: `treesit-node-check' lacks a way to
 tell if a node belongs to a deleted parser
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 05:31:11 +0200
> From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 19:00:30 -0800
> Cc: Mickey Petersen <mickey <at> masteringemacs.org>,
>  61235 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > Yuan, any reason not to extend treesit-node-check instead?
> 
> I did extend treesit-node-check in the patch. But I also added a function treesit-parser-live-p, which makes the same check but directly on a parser. It just made sense to me that if we let treesit-node-check check the nodes’ parser’s status, we’d also add a function to allow directly checking the status of a parser.

That additional function would signal an error in the case discussed
here, so I'm not sure we should add it in that shape, or at all.  Why
isn't treesit-node-check enough?




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 94 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.