GNU bug report logs - #61214
[PATCH guix-artwork] website: posts: Add Dissecting Guix, Part 2: The Store Monad.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>, "(" <paren <at> disroot.org>
Cc: 61214 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#61214] [PATCH guix-artwork v3] website: posts: Add Dissecting Guix, Part 2: The Store Monad.
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 13:08:33 +0100

Hi Chris,

On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 at 10:47, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> wrote:

> I'd say that Guile is a strongly typed language. I'm also not sure what
> the point about compensating for something lacking in Guile means.

From my understanding, “strongly typed” is poorly defined and there is
no strong consensus.  The Guile compiler accepts this,

    (define (bang) (+ 1 "0"))

and typed language folks say it should not be possible for a decent
compiler supporting “strongly typed” language.

From my point of view, it is better to speak about dynamically typed and
statically typed where definition is clearer.

About the remark about “compensating“, I guess the point is that using
language with a powerful type system, this monad story is somehow
included in the type system machinery; for instance Haskell.  Since
Guile does not have such type system – but instead it has macros ;-) –
then the monad story needs an implementation for its own.

(Aside, is monad another way to see macro? [1] :-))

Cheers,
simon


1: <http://kawagner.blogspot.com/2007/02/understanding-monads-for-real.html>

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.