From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:24:43 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#61182 <61182@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#61182 <61182@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: What is different about Emacs 29? Reply-To: bug#61182 <61182@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:24:43 +0000 retitle 61182 What is different about Emacs 29? reassign 61182 emacs submitter 61182 Juri Linkov severity 61182 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 30 12:31:30 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2023 17:31:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50264 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pMY0A-0000rU-HN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 12:31:30 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59566) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pMY08-0000rG-MR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 12:31:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMY08-00046j-GD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 12:31:28 -0500 Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMY07-0007iF-0d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 12:31:28 -0500 Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CB67100002 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:31:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Juri Linkov To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: What is different about Emacs 29? Organization: LINKOV.NET Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 19:11:22 +0200 Message-ID: <86ilgoi7hx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.178.231; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay11.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) In the GNU Emacs FAQ there is the node "What is different about Emacs 28?", but not yet the node "What is different about Emacs 29?". Should this node be just the reverse copy of Antinews, i.e. Anti-Antinews? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 30 13:00:56 2023 Received: (at 61182) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2023 18:00:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50330 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pMYSd-0001pV-RI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:00:56 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49526) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pMYSc-0001pF-OT for 61182@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:00:55 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMYSX-0007Ac-IQ; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:00:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=QjZW/bjY1YblcsDyea8j+ATYfkanDn9RTVlf6fbwYvc=; b=djGSFpMb7i+f zHoc83nh3d3hXgScfXVm7KR4CVSgMSWwEo46BJdILWF6Fg49UjCVqDTLjscPkPENzHTvb8MdJb6fn qlncZKSC/kSZJccI0odKe5ptaGXza3/vqtF4CR35mddE3m/n8XaJQuVK9zALc63Hs5chF1tczjSmc FlpB2FHxSzR/KWmlVPQexTWp9pvLsGqhgCn3/L3BPBYfh6CQlnJw+qknB5Nds/oF+kcTlWpKVffax sz2gmUmATcIH+Z0uyti9sO4YR8mAzXKzrkO4dcj2Cs3N7eadACBolA5O5nR4zatNp0Q1k4lIxuRcO HMi52K17YjkiuJ6rVV/L0w==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pMYSW-00031r-TQ; Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:00:49 -0500 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 20:00:43 +0200 Message-Id: <837cx352d0.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Juri Linkov In-Reply-To: <86ilgoi7hx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Mon, 30 Jan 2023 19:11:22 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#61182: What is different about Emacs 29? References: <86ilgoi7hx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61182 Cc: 61182@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Juri Linkov > Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 19:11:22 +0200 > > In the GNU Emacs FAQ there is the node "What is different about Emacs 28?", > but not yet the node "What is different about Emacs 29?". Should this node > be just the reverse copy of Antinews, i.e. Anti-Antinews? More or less. It doesn't have to list exactly the same items, though. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 01 00:02:41 2023 Received: (at 61182) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2023 05:02:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56145 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pN5GU-0003hp-Vl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:02:41 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36250) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pN5GI-0003hT-TZ for 61182@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:02:33 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pN5GC-0000co-5b; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:02:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=BnLoSedhrRpUBpURGoj4MkxkBvtxMw7Rgy0ggyiiCBM=; b=lSvuENv7RIXq zHuGPqN5JGOhHaSotFDQj/C6uzKFkkyCA1SrIhfqXy4EqcIBiOV9nj1bQH/PMeNyuDX6quWD5u6T+ WiZPES63QIHl+e/ubQAE/SPPi4Q7pUdp3K5briXDwgMHBxV2WlDbBa9qWeCrEDiNEDgUvMkKnRe5s igHh/gqicNkDQqWldLc8G7R9/OC7PEWtGcg96p7zt4EIpBqWnw8fNDcBWy9ec7+QJOAY6a4GWDAs5 N8SUwbTt5lnxiIZWrQjPMfhFKh86Z6wPRB7Bcbus8rAa8UP1ezFEgAUmNxAmwEKxGtm9SnxT/Ztas iGrXGfR/2sZYUBkbKNXSzg==; Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pN5GA-0002en-TB; Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:02:14 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 From: Richard Stallman To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <837cx352d0.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 30 Jan 2023 20:00:43 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#61182: What is different about Emacs 29? References: <86ilgoi7hx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <837cx352d0.fsf@gnu.org> Message-Id: Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:02:14 -0500 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61182 Cc: 61182@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > In the GNU Emacs FAQ there is the node "What is different about Emacs 28?", > > but not yet the node "What is different about Emacs 29?". Should this node > > be just the reverse copy of Antinews, i.e. Anti-Antinews? > More or less. It doesn't have to list exactly the same items, though. This summary of Emacs 29 news should list helpful things for you to know to use Emacs 29 based on an Emacs 28 manual. The Emacs 28 Antinews describes things important for you to know to use Emacs 28 based on an Emacs 29 manual. It's the same kind of idea, but the details are different -- usually there is no overlap. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 05 13:38:34 2023 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2023 18:38:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46440 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pOjuL-0002C4-Rq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:38:34 -0500 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:60779) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pOjuJ-0002Bo-OE for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:38:32 -0500 Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD337FF803 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 18:38:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Juri Linkov To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#61182: What is different about Emacs 29? In-Reply-To: <837cx352d0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 30 Jan 2023 20:00:43 +0200") Organization: LINKOV.NET References: <86ilgoi7hx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <837cx352d0.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 20:37:52 +0200 Message-ID: <86wn4wargf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) close 61182 29.0.60 thanks From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:24:43 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 12:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator