GNU bug report logs -
#61156
‘guix container exec’ does not actually change PID namespaces
Previous Next
Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 21:59:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jan 2023 23:51:52 +0100
with message-id <87357rws8n.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#61156: ‘guix container exec’ does not actually change PID namespaces
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #61156,
regarding ‘guix container exec’ does not actually change PID namespaces
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
61156: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61156
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Currently, when a Guix program runs in separate user, mount, and PID
namespaces (for example via (guix least-authority)), ‘guix container
exec’ fails badly:
guix container exec 10652 /gnu/store/720rj90bch716isd8z7lcwrnvz28ap4y-bash-static-5.1.8/bin/sh
guix container: error: process terminated with signal 11
or, similarly:
nsenter --preserve-credentials -U -m -t 10652 -m -U -p -F /gnu/store/720rj90bch716isd8z7lcwrnvz28ap4y-bash-static-5.1.8/bin/sh
Segmentation fault
Stracing reveals that the child process segfaults immediately after
attempting to read /proc/self/exe:
14111 readlink("/proc/self/exe", 0x7ffccefa29c0, 4096) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
14111 --- SIGSEGV {si_signo=SIGSEGV, si_code=SEGV_MAPERR, si_addr=0xffffffffffffffff} ---
The segfault is due to <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52671>.
But why isn’t /proc visible in the first place? It *is* definitely
mounted within that process’s namespace, as confirmed here:
$ ls -ld /proc/10652/root/proc
dr-xr-xr-x 326 root root 0 Jan 29 21:55 /proc/10652/root/proc/
The reason is that calling setns(2) on a PID namespace “changes only the
PID namespace that subsequently created child processes of the caller
will be placed in; it does not change the PID namespace of the caller
itself.”
This is why removing ‘-F’ in the ‘nsenter’ command line above solves the
problem.
Conclusion: ’container-excursion’ should fork so that the PID namespace
change takes effect.
Ludo’.
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:
> The reason is that calling setns(2) on a PID namespace “changes only the
> PID namespace that subsequently created child processes of the caller
> will be placed in; it does not change the PID namespace of the caller
> itself.”
Fixed in 0ef8fe22ed8985c9656835fc25ab3463d55b6669.
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 110 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.