From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:13:12 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#61103 <61103@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#61103 <61103@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: (no subject) Reply-To: bug#61103 <61103@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:13:12 +0000 retitle 61103 (no subject) reassign 61103 guix-patches submitter 61103 Maya Tomasek severity 61103 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jan 27 14:36:59 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2023 19:36:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38528 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pLUWw-0004lp-QC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:36:59 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:41934) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pLUWr-0004lb-7h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:36:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLUWr-0003ws-1j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:36:53 -0500 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pLUWo-0007ZQ-HU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 14:36:52 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD81D41135 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 20:36:46 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nrcTaSwZLg12 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2023 20:36:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 20:36:44 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1674848205; bh=zkR/0dRuWV/PQE4dQAN7CJryW7abfikIOE7slM+cDEM=; h=Date:From:To; b=ZAdfimaC6xFuloghCepdqctVL68oaedfRzUCvoI/dMk50sbvw/CFlaCSx7f9rx1Q0 nSde3nBDMlPdGLbjfYJU1jdBbRFEbOI5p2Q5eqRJfvXeqH9DQksJ3avRZMiOEzpG9p hYu5bjGA29auqiK+0rjzpWwx1fgJbHuUARSvw/nej9drj2VSyDhOXbU3W/50gUrlcI VVKYOUR36ZrGDDQgpaPGEkJhKRLBdVM9xyvy6tEPnK/528bqoBUmFVKSaUyTPwnwcQ pWy8UMUGCbIMaJ1M0NaJzW9FUVC+NVUry40+URxXMj0TyYj+r/X/DI0AlNQN6G3dkZ PZTTIgz3tK+qA== Message-ID: <7730eb7a4bbe3bde3de772349901ba21.maya.tomasek@disroot.org> From: Maya Tomasek To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=maya.tomasek@disroot.org; helo=knopi.disroot.org X-Spam_score_int: -2 X-Spam_score: -0.3 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MISSING_SUBJECT=1.799, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) From: Maya Tomasek Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 20:26:11 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Move dconf-editor native-input glib:bin to propagated-inputs dconf-editor crashes with "No GSettings schemas are installed on the system", this provides the expected schemas. --- Hi, I have noticed that dconf-editor by default crashes as it has no schemas. This is probably undesired, as most users install dconf-editor to edit settings on gnome. But there is no indication that the actual error is missing glib:bin. The issue isn't fixed by moving glib:bin to inputs. It has to be in propagated inputs. Kind regards, Maya gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm index de5b5df450..fd74b7df2d 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm @@ -10035,13 +10035,14 @@ (define-public dconf-editor (arguments (list #:meson meson-0.60)) (native-inputs - `(("glib:bin" ,glib "bin") ; for glib-compile-schemas, gio-2.0. - ("gtk+-bin" ,gtk+ "bin") ; for gtk-update-icon-cache + `(("gtk+-bin" ,gtk+ "bin") ; for gtk-update-icon-cache ("intltool" ,intltool) ("pkg-config" ,pkg-config) ("vala" ,vala))) (inputs (list dconf gtk+ libxml2)) + (propagated-inputs + (list `(,glib "bin"))) (home-page "https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/dconf-editor") (synopsis "Graphical editor for GNOME's dconf configuration system") (description -- 2.39.1 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 03 18:04:13 2023 Received: (at 61103) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2023 23:04:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40168 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pO56K-0000M7-UP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 18:04:13 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f65.google.com ([209.85.218.65]:35434) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pO56G-0000Lr-Ky for 61103@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 18:04:11 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f65.google.com with SMTP id qw12so19496055ejc.2 for <61103@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 15:04:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=+TBcabBxoJO8Jr8yK+3atkk/2IlVIZ4exT/BmNsD75g=; b=askx4LVatBvIIquFBiFZjVmJ/+CprbWO/UjSAhuZ+q3uI53bLiCkKh1EX0JbafXpRl lebOw15nCcsZRGtBl9OivmfDC+1PwLVMR+A74xQ1mNgKsw3c0PzAOVa8LGgpOSSGIaVs hj8s8Tcuva5BSHddXFkRjwTU1Yu0q70yGpmEv1w3Ip5Ij4KGZwHgLbXBh0I2F/0Ema/k wufhh60MiHR0iZvxXdZ1eljf4Wl9z3QdrupVqlctH0bZuxDWic4dwOkSm33seQuPrCD7 ijb+MUJyMsh6AF0p6sTChtHItr6yYApJSTrRrBR5oGMAfqVhCIF/XgbU3TBqYfxn2bZp BuHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+TBcabBxoJO8Jr8yK+3atkk/2IlVIZ4exT/BmNsD75g=; b=NDJWa98RSWwtN7Cu74d7E5LxU/eKBBtxDmpM8nUD4lATSc8hUwsLTjUweVoAHyIbkv 7PE2T4U80jYbEqhCEbEaLuhvWbwfzGqBrUkSliN0GbEMw7WsrBccVNdKYZKaYneqlo4W xSntpVkqDGQCtjC+jTOo2o05me9fVLj0bdwTDeQF47lgC20K+KqgcbwkJhM0+ifeoxNP Es1lzAOQa9lTzu3JnB/rM2sEocysDlr7LSGbnEckJsENsHsKEhIoIP+RpIZIA31ELVb8 yiYhODz2fnNCWsYdOU61mzo3cFrthXyDcmcoVopWl6541jX7r6O76dCuOfflZoDwxaXd 0wIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUMS82Ri1ya2/71zndaG75qtPqw6PCfTWJXhp9DzwkO492hEBXi GeVJgb1tpogV4sO2SzRLLkQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/4NKJcoL3B/pmQiic09EOMGKVdT82xZq7vDlCfTk6NbhTBc+p2eLhQL3O5Dx7RWzoJpyuadg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5054:b0:88c:bc3e:de39 with SMTP id e20-20020a170906505400b0088cbc3ede39mr12450435ejk.31.1675465442854; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 15:04:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-52-93.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.52.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cd11-20020a170906b34b00b008720c458bd4sm2006891ejb.3.2023.02.03.15.04.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 Feb 2023 15:04:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: No Subject From: Liliana Marie Prikler To: Maya Tomasek , 61103@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 00:04:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <7730eb7a4bbe3bde3de772349901ba21.maya.tomasek@disroot.org> References: <7730eb7a4bbe3bde3de772349901ba21.maya.tomasek@disroot.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Am Freitag, dem 27.01.2023 um 20:36 +0100 schrieb Maya Tomasek: > From: Maya Tomasek > Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 20:26:11 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Move dconf-editor native-input glib:bin to >  pr [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (liliana.prikler[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.218.65 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.218.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61103 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hi, Am Freitag, dem 27.01.2023 um 20:36 +0100 schrieb Maya Tomasek: > From: Maya Tomasek > Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 20:26:11 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Move dconf-editor native-input glib:bin to > =C2=A0propagated-inputs >=20 > dconf-editor crashes with "No GSettings schemas are installed on the > system", this provides the expected schemas. > --- > Hi, >=20 > I have noticed that dconf-editor by default crashes as it has no > schemas. This is probably undesired, as most users install dconf- > editor to edit settings on gnome. But there is no indication that the > actual error is missing glib:bin. The issue isn't fixed by moving > glib:bin to inputs. It has to be in propagated inputs. >=20 > Kind regards, > Maya I am fairly certain that by default, dconf-editor does not crash when using gnome-desktop-service-type (i.e. the "default" configuration).=20 Now fair enough, it might still break in the way you described *outside of gnome*, but in any case, propagating inputs is no solution and in this case, you're breaking cross-compilation to rely on a side effect. The package you do want is most likely gsettings-desktop-schemas, and I think it ought to be possible to fix dconf-editor without propagating it. Cheers From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 04 05:50:57 2023 Received: (at 61103) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2023 10:50:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40761 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pOG8H-0001df-IY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 05:50:57 -0500 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:34156) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pOG8E-0001dV-Tc for 61103@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 05:50:55 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4872441492; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 11:50:53 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ulRR2Rby-qK; Sat, 4 Feb 2023 11:50:52 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?B?TcOhamEgVG9tw6HFoWVr?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1675507852; bh=yOXwh9vvRPt7hg5zVAcgCAToUa8912Fm9M9KirbX+4o=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=IOQKSvRRiMdzSxl+JtX/BEm3TMWlzNPFygF813LbJyHeUxXIT6UH5vuCdYuc30diM 06/5eDQWiNFf1BYc//4y+8sg1MXYktQ+9cc0cA2VpitcsUDIS3s78UW1Z+mDgUUXo2 X5eiCPFE2vk/nVq6IK8YjrsYaRwzFQi9fEdrF2UkI3OV7b9O8G4Ptc5QH5+++lKoRO aeER3dbSYjOcQ+0huO9Fbt0p2nLOGGK7eZxYTpoFjiliuxCIvuIgED64nmiYut8LH+ DQc5/M0usc+swmHs+bs3dSDhyASQXo6vrudgvMVCxX/klO+RsX7DYurBw415CEg0HB /zaDg8shLqx5Q== To: Liliana Marie Prikler , 61103@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: No Subject In-Reply-To: References: <7730eb7a4bbe3bde3de772349901ba21.maya.tomasek@disroot.org> Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 11:50:50 +0100 Message-ID: <877cwxaelx.fsf@disroot.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > I am fairly certain that by default, dconf-editor does not crash when > using gnome-desktop-service-type (i.e. the "default" configuration). Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61103 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > I am fairly certain that by default, dconf-editor does not crash when > using gnome-desktop-service-type (i.e. the "default" configuration). I'm afraid that it does. At least on my system it does. I use gnome-desktop-service-type. > Now fair enough, it might still break in the way you described *outside > of gnome*, but in any case, propagating inputs is no solution and in > this case, you're breaking cross-compilation to rely on a side effect. I understand that it is not an optimal solution. I didn't like it either, but I didn't find any other solution > The package you do want is most likely gsettings-desktop-schemas I have now tried the following: --- $ guix shell --pure gsettings-desktop-schemas dconf-editor $ dconf-editor (dconf-editor:4990): dbind-WARNING **: 11:46:30.355: AT-SPI: Error retrieving accessibility bus address: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.a11y.Bus was not provided by any .service files (dconf-editor:4990): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: 11:46:30.369: No GSettings schemas are installed on the system zsh: trace trap dconf-editor --- and --- $ guix shell gsettings-desktop-schemas dconf-editor $ dconf-editor (dconf-editor:5048): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: 11:47:58.518: Settings schema 'ca.desrt.dconf-editor.Lib' is not installed zsh: trace trap dconf-editor --- Both resulting in an error. Yes the error is different but I'm not knowledgeable enough to fix this issue. > think it ought to be possible to fix dconf-editor without propagating That would be great! Regards, Maya From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 04 12:27:12 2023 Received: (at 61103) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2023 17:27:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43366 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pOMJj-0000jC-Tr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 12:27:12 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f66.google.com ([209.85.208.66]:40948) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pOMJd-0000ic-M5 for 61103@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 12:27:10 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f66.google.com with SMTP id fi26so7942288edb.7 for <61103@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 09:27:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ATFgbE4KbScHqUD8lyfbEOpUHb17+j/tYUd+2ThTnpk=; b=ZsgG2/9lkZdGYNg+emT6saTuI6AlwnX3WpGpYNGqvaETUlObGakl9ThCZzJ0DRwxk8 yI5VgrM3kKy0C8+W6KB+BHFY0zEk3ik4Cbq8pi5w0yMeQKpCV6cEYRYRw+PnNEVZE+cs lq+yB2vRQAfOo4dhKpsmL4qQljNFSU9sOAcafWrPRNNYQN5GcmLvd2Co5SyyvYpqiqGI FTZ86QO1/rJe0uwymFs/eMYizArToFk2sxhTU3818pO63Rki8lr/h/BMTyBv3lHveUb7 8EnOHRd+EgYHN5Rs37eysBEKI87PSAFcEedS5XWIPKVCnz7/lb2Kob8Kw0hjnnWY3bOd 4ouw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ATFgbE4KbScHqUD8lyfbEOpUHb17+j/tYUd+2ThTnpk=; b=wosSp3hqHb0o5kf6Fsl3/bsTxRaMJgaQ4vWG63dL9MyqMCsyK5vtp+9lJ9UjFVYl8O yPfXrIQSInYQLrCyzj1o3rW6JCTQhGu5w6I0HwLzcR+Pnj4lxWvOmsd68vF5zC5tN7u1 714Ism+2CXJAHjZkAXWHFx/C9o0xJttq9BoqCLGkQ9UXqqdsl6s74C2Vl6+CUSBZTja7 KTKqUCt5C4RIH0FRWAc0ZLOVjdptKHAw5wHx6lGBsk7OtqOq5dHoLm+eJPR//fgWyslw QuuAhdknbnOQrG8RE2Q3t7j4IWOyvu5ny2b/PxQDwiMABTMUfkrGuCK/ABWx1PON0eJS URuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWui0I/6OZCGyNV+CIVGa7Fc7BrVGy0Kj7N0AtBM2rhkjP4K295 CpyE1GO7WFHYNNEXVkLE7Yo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8GP6Ahhly67eME/iWwBh2Z/1TxlgAfznv6/C8JEihPbKABRy0zMge4f8QJ8rju3Cn7Uy98qg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1c87:b0:499:376e:6b35 with SMTP id cy7-20020a0564021c8700b00499376e6b35mr11818368edb.25.1675531618821; Sat, 04 Feb 2023 09:26:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-52-93.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.52.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cq25-20020a056402221900b004a0afea4c9csm2791389edb.18.2023.02.04.09.26.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 04 Feb 2023 09:26:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: No Subject From: Liliana Marie Prikler To: =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=A1ja_Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1ek?= , 61103@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 18:26:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <877cwxaelx.fsf@disroot.org> References: <7730eb7a4bbe3bde3de772349901ba21.maya.tomasek@disroot.org> <877cwxaelx.fsf@disroot.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 3.3 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am Samstag, dem 04.02.2023 um 11:50 +0100 schrieb Mája Tomášek: > Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > > > I am fairly certain that by default, dconf-editor does not crash > > when using gnome-desktop [...] Content analysis details: (3.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (liliana.prikler[at]gmail.com) 1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL, https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/ [209.85.208.66 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.208.66 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.208.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61103 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am Samstag, dem 04.02.2023 um 11:50 +0100 schrieb Mája Tomášek: > Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > > > I am fairly certain that by default, dconf-editor does not crash > > when using gnome-desktop [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.208.66 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 1.3 RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL RBL: Relay in Validity RPBL, https://senderscore.org/blocklistlookup/ [209.85.208.66 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.208.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (liliana.prikler[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Am Samstag, dem 04.02.2023 um 11:50 +0100 schrieb M=C3=A1ja Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1= ek: > Liliana Marie Prikler writes: >=20 > > I am fairly certain that by default, dconf-editor does not crash > > when using gnome-desktop-service-type (i.e. the "default" > > configuration). >=20 > I'm afraid that it does. At least on my system it does. I use gnome- > desktop-service-type. I just tested it in a VM and for me it behaves as I would expect. Now, you could have corrupt dconf data that make it act up (try with ~/.config/dconf and ~/.cache/dconf moved to different locations) or a corrupt dconf/gsettings package (try guix build --repair), but as far as gnome-desktop-service-type is concerned, this is not an expected error mode with intact packages. >=20 Cheers From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 11 09:15:09 2023 Received: (at 61103) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2023 14:15:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39176 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pQqeh-0007Pw-9J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 09:15:09 -0500 Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:54678) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pQqec-0007P8-7i for 61103@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 09:15:06 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501D7411BA; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 15:15:00 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lYCt2sgfE7uh; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 15:14:59 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?B?TcOhamEgVG9tw6HFoWVr?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1676124899; bh=W9MKAc7oLOmCoS8POUPgNxyYmtmm99PbWLH7CzFrySg=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=kiFqXqUIEkaX4K5IIcuh/jN/4bqcUi+2WFp2Shamipx7miABm9/qgMgsOUSg8cTka rhc6ImH/T7ZNyCGUm+Wxpwnag6e77jXwWrtiFjg+1pTI9D16s7AZsDSlow7PBmcWFg UH883aIoUlJSKVnGg6/EGiZwihfhpg6G/MTsv3sC/yPL3Aa2L8/ktagNPbu27dUWID hAfTSEVdCx0NdVqpMTJeVJ4Ua4A3uVtyN/0sQQbUxHI74uX62eyS4zWi5tgzsY0WAD 8otNnRvPfqil9lEUxIgeTcveRH/kw2jCDRs3pSeh1+q2rcYUBiCuX+jzjSgg6MA6JJ /RosXROwKVpoA== To: Liliana Marie Prikler , 61103@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: No Subject In-Reply-To: References: <7730eb7a4bbe3bde3de772349901ba21.maya.tomasek@disroot.org> <877cwxaelx.fsf@disroot.org> Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 15:14:55 +0100 Message-ID: <87edqw47c0.fsf@disroot.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > I just tested it in a VM and for me it behaves as I would expect. Well, that means that it really is issue on my side then. Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61103 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > I just tested it in a VM and for me it behaves as I would expect. Well, that means that it really is issue on my side then. > you could have corrupt dconf data that make it act up (try with > ~/.config/dconf and ~/.cache/dconf moved to different locations) or a > corrupt dconf/gsettings package (try guix build --repair), I have tried all of them, but the issue persists. At least if it isn't a global issue, I'm happy. Cheers From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 21 22:01:45 2023 Received: (at 61103-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2023 02:01:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33054 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pennN-0006ua-HD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:01:45 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f177.google.com ([209.85.160.177]:46604) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pennL-0006uL-4K for 61103-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:01:43 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f177.google.com with SMTP id c19so21076268qtn.13 for <61103-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 19:01:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1679450497; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rIuxoWzM/ZCqIcswMADj9zL5Y3Y32z9W4lJiNKrfS1M=; b=ql6b9CTsrUTWEfYngkBS7wtLi9ZX5e3adEwpx2xCWhSjDbYUm6wWpAF8NhineHq8tK e2SZaD8fgZrkG2OYLt9bl92rqqpCfifLE4vAyPfBPArF8tFClj7Hc1rkpZR786r17+jI 3QvxTf/uK7Z72NmZO1+GdKj0JAS6h57Q0Ra1QH4c357AfObu6geg4W3hix5fFzxSdvYZ 4FGIhYQXjpA7ySN5QoAWj34isQyOPeNt3V1/2oG6aw0ivTAu/4HaKOdgit0tJPeVqWaH S9SAA4aClCDvvQo+6Dnjw3mtXIkEAP4cAatWFgX8Xr6Zummn2tv4E/IOdX6GY9MJIkmb ob/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679450497; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rIuxoWzM/ZCqIcswMADj9zL5Y3Y32z9W4lJiNKrfS1M=; b=OqxTl8gjD9Razcq82tiG3o7ZN+Uw2VCuLNCqvPghz9SIElV/B45UFAEkF2uv3gLMBx dFXFQ5RpPVzPsePK3Abls+SkbyeIskU+tXt/+mDfjHUlJuGSgSyOosU59Io+6mvqzaam KL8hKUVlpqyec1FnKDgd85ieR30+gVabE25XOFISlP/U7EeyMVX3bxCSzg7kat5KeNlQ LdCTqFE5xyEg11ofTkMUTWOhEA590rixxIAno4TEhzMDtk2wHpB6mGR8urnmBSBXgtNA hXTSBg3dc/g6Ipr2nkij4fQ3/s5XnwkpxN72phrkNHZo6YEOdabQ6G05cRM4vb2K8Lge FpNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUSWe2CmgZs5/0SZE3FrDW09cClnjQvgFxIIfvv7CT5RtGP7CoK KFWMOdwzPoIkKGu7XUjhmoeWfimOaJwWHQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/TPtP/M1KIJCVzh/QcpPoO0WIwXDdYDysDkfTRqDfe8uh5QwKBVk2do0K1OeoBnBMfRsSmyQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:345:b0:3bf:d149:8966 with SMTP id r5-20020a05622a034500b003bfd1498966mr3730185qtw.62.1679450497046; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 19:01:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-130-195.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.130.195]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s12-20020ac8758c000000b003e389560a05sm765815qtq.51.2023.03.21.19.01.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Mar 2023 19:01:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: =?utf-8?B?TcOhamEgVG9tw6HFoWVr?= Subject: Re: bug#61103: (no subject) References: <7730eb7a4bbe3bde3de772349901ba21.maya.tomasek@disroot.org> <877cwxaelx.fsf@disroot.org> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:01:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877cwxaelx.fsf@disroot.org> (=?utf-8?B?Ik3DoWphIFRvbcOhxaFl?= =?utf-8?B?ayIncw==?= message of "Sat, 04 Feb 2023 11:50:50 +0100") Message-ID: <875yatk0hs.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, Mája Tomášek writes: > Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > >> I am fairly certain that by default, dconf-editor does not crash when >> using gnome-desktop-service-type (i.e. the "default" configuration). > > I'm afraid that [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (maxim.cournoyer[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.160.177 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.160.177 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61103-done Cc: 61103-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Liliana Marie Prikler X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Hi, M=C3=A1ja Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1ek writes: > Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > >> I am fairly certain that by default, dconf-editor does not crash when >> using gnome-desktop-service-type (i.e. the "default" configuration). > > I'm afraid that it does. At least on my system it does. I use gnome-deskt= op-service-type. > >> Now fair enough, it might still break in the way you described *outside >> of gnome*, but in any case, propagating inputs is no solution and in >> this case, you're breaking cross-compilation to rely on a side effect. > > I understand that it is not an optimal solution. I didn't like it > either, but I didn't find any other solution > >> The package you do want is most likely gsettings-desktop-schemas > > I have now tried the following: > > --- > $ guix shell --pure gsettings-desktop-schemas dconf-editor > $ dconf-editor=20 > > (dconf-editor:4990): dbind-WARNING **: 11:46:30.355: AT-SPI: Error > retrieving accessibility bus address: > org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.a11y.Bus was > not provided by any .service files > > (dconf-editor:4990): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: 11:46:30.369: No GSettings schema= s are installed on the system > zsh: trace trap dconf-editor > --- > > and > --- > $ guix shell gsettings-desktop-schemas dconf-editor=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 > $ dconf-editor=20 > > (dconf-editor:5048): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: 11:47:58.518: Settings schema > 'ca.desrt.dconf-editor.Lib' is not installed > zsh: trace trap dconf-editor > --- > > Both resulting in an error. Yes the error is different but I'm not > knowledgeable enough to fix this issue. > >> think it ought to be possible to fix dconf-editor without propagating > > That would be great! I don't see anything to fix; dconf-editor complains an throws an error when there are no schemas found. Schemas are found via a native-search-path defined on glib (XDG_DATA_DIRS). Fixing #22138 would probably help to some degree but otherwise that's normal Guix behavior, I think. Thus, closing. --=20 Thanks, Maxim From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:13:12 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator