GNU bug report logs - #61036
[PATCH 0/3] Update zig to 0.10.1

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#61036: closed ([PATCH 0/3] Update zig to 0.10.1)
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2023 05:58:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2023 08:57:03 +0300
with message-id <ZH7Kr6rWxRXUhnQ6 <at> 3900XT>
and subject line Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: zig: Update to 0.10.1.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #61036,
regarding [PATCH 0/3] Update zig to 0.10.1
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
61036: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61036
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Update zig to 0.10.1
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 11:42:17 +0200

After looking heavily through the sources I'm of the opinion that zig
0.10.1 doesn't use the new binary bootstrap that they've developed.

I'm unsure what to do with $output/bin/zig not finding ld-linux in its
RUNPATH, but it's the only thing that's left me unhappy.

I wasn't sure if we wanted to keep 0.9 around also, but I didn't want to
be responsible for updating zig-zls so I figured we'd keep it for now,
especially since they make a point of saying that the language isn't
finalized at its 1.0 release yet.


Efraim Flashner (2):
  gnu: zig: Update to 0.10.1.
  gnu: ncdu: Update to 2.2.2.

 gnu/packages/ncdu.scm    |   6 +--
 gnu/packages/zig-xyz.scm |   2 +-
 gnu/packages/zig.scm     | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)


base-commit: 5965d74c8ce53d0861af9ad3744844ac925c4a12
-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: 61036-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: zig: Update to 0.10.1.
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 08:57:03 +0300

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

Patch was pushed a few months ago. Closing!

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.