GNU bug report logs - #61022
28.2.50; Mouse tracking of high coordinates not working in rxvt-unicode

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: git <at> vladimir.panteleev.md

Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 05:53:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 28.2.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #17 received at 61022 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jared Finder <jared <at> finder.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: git <at> vladimir.panteleev.md, 61022 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#61022: 28.2.50; Mouse tracking of high coordinates not
 working in rxvt-unicode
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 21:09:03 -0800
On 2023-01-24 4:24 am, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 22:56:09 -0800
>> From: Jared Finder <jared <at> finder.org>
>> Cc: git <at> vladimir.panteleev.md, 61022 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> 
>> The change mostly works as inherit-input-method also causes UTF-8
>> decoding to happen deep in read_char at the C level. (Is this
>> intentional? I assume so because read-char just reads single bytes
>> normally.)
> 
> Yes, that's how we decode keyboard input using keyboard-coding-system.
> 
>> However, I think the following change is more appropriate:
>> 
>> -          (read-char nil nil 0.1))
>> +          ;; Read a character with input method conversion enabled
>> +          ;; but no conversion to force read-char to decode UTF-8
>> +          ;; byte sequences.
>> +          (let ((input-method-function nil))
>> +            (read-char nil t 0.1)))
>> 
>> This way we don't apply an actual input method conversion to 
>> characters.
>> For example, without this additional change, if the 'british input
>> method was active, the # ==> £ conversion would
>> happen, causing mouse events with X=2 to instead have X=131.
> 
> OK, but shouldn't we also use INHERIT-INPUT-METHOD = t in the call to
> read-char only when xterm-mouse-utf-8 option is set?  Otherwise, we
> rely on read-char to not perform any conversions, but why rely on that
> if we already know we don't want any conversions in that case?  Using
> nil when xterm-mouse-utf-8 is unset sounds like a more future-proof
> change, no?

I think that's not just future-proof, it's more correct.

  -- MJF




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 169 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.