Subject: bug#6098: Someone obviously tried to fix this upstream...

From: Dave Abrahams <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:49:38 -0400

Currently the code reads as follows:

    (gud-def gud-break  "break %d%f:%l"  "\C-b" "Set breakpoint at current line.")
    (gud-def gud-remove "clear %d%f:%l"  "\C-d" "Remove breakpoint at current line")

However, tests show that it doesn't work without the directory separator
"/" after "%d" on both lines.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com