GNU bug report logs - #60961
29.0.60; Compiling emacs-29 without treesitter outputs warnings

Previous Next

Full log

Message #30 received at 60961 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
To: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>,
 60961 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#60961: 29.0.60; Compiling emacs-29 without treesitter outputs
 warnings
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 14:36:00 -0800

> On Jan 20, 2023, at 2:30 PM, Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 20 January 2023 23:11:44 CET, Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 20, 2023, at 8:07 AM, Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 20 January 2023 16:17:22 CET, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>>>>> From: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
>>>>> Cc: rpluim <at> gmail.com, casouri <at> gmail.com, 60961 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>>>> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 15:43:33 +0100
>>>>> 
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So I can either just make sure that no modes require across modes, or
>>>>>>> make that "lib" right now.  What do you think?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I tend to the "lib" method.  Mostly because several modes, including
>>>>>> some that are unrelated to C, want the code which was written for
>>>>>> C/C++, and so it is possible that there's some general feature here
>>>>>> waiting for us to refactor the code -- in which case perhaps the code
>>>>>> should be in treesit.el?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> IOW, how come JS, Rust, and Typescript all want comment-related setup
>>>>>> that was written for C?
>> 
>> Because they all have C-like syntax, so they have the same setup for indenting and filling block comments, for example.
>> 
>>>>>> If this is just a coincidence, then perhaps
>>>>>> duplicating the code is a better idea, but if there's some underlying
>>>>>> commonality, we should have common code in treesit.el, or maybe in
>>>>>> some c-ts-common.el?
>> 
>> c-ts-common.el sounds good to me.
>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I can start by moving it into treesit.el, then we can maybe extract
>>>>> something out later.  Sounds good?  I can do it tonight, unless any of
>>>>> you object :)
>>>> 
>>>> SGTM, but let's hear from Yuan before you start working on this.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>> 
>>> Thumbs up
>> 
>> I’d prefer c-ts-common.el over treesit.el, since they only apply to C-like languages. There is no harm putting them in a separate file, right? I wrote some commentary in c-ts-mode, which notes all the shared functions and variables. 
>> 
>> Yuan
>> 
> 
> Ok, should I do it or you? :)
> 
> Theo

The honor is yours :-)

Yuan

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.