GNU bug report logs - #60905
[PATCH 08/25] gnu: go-github-com-pkg-diff: Update to 0.0.0-20210226163009-20ebb0f2a09e.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e <at> gmail.com>
To: 60905 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, mail <at> cbaines.net
Cc: paren <at> disroot.org
Subject: [bug#60905] [PATCH 08/25] gnu: go-github-com-pkg-diff: Update to 0.0.0-20210226163009-20ebb0f2a09e.
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 10:04:17 -0700

"( via Guix-patches" via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:

> * gnu/packages/golang.scm (go-github-com-pkg-diff): Update to
> 0.0.0-20210226163009-20ebb0f2a09e.
>
>> --- a/gnu/packages/golang.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/golang.scm
>
>> @@ -8736,30 +8736,26 @@ (define-public go-github-com-go-git-go-git-fixtures
>
>> +  (package
>> +    (name "go-github-com-pkg-diff")
>> +    (version "0.0.0-20210226163009-20ebb0f2a09e")
>
> As Chris said, don't use this kind of version string :)

Ah, I actually have (what I think) is a valid reason for this. In Go,
when a module is in development, this long string, including the SHA, is
the actual version[1] of the module, and carries semantics for Go developers, i.e. "Signals that the module is still in development and unstable. The release carries no backwards compatibility or stability guarantees."

It's how it will be referenced by other Go modules, and so I thought it
best to make the version field reflect the actual version. The previous
iteration of this package had an incorrect version: upstream did not
assign it a 0.0.1 version; that's something we did.

I agree that this is confusing for Guix maintainers, and causes
duplicate information in the version and commit fields.

What are your opinions on this?

>> +    (source (origin
>> +              (method git-fetch)
>> +              (uri (git-reference
>> +                    (url "https://github.com/pkg/diff")
>> +                    (commit "20ebb0f2a09e612109b224b32f79370409108bcc")))
>
> And especially don't write the commit twice.
>
>> +    (synopsis "Create and print diffs")
>
>   (synopsis "Generate and print diffs in Go")

I only bumped the version here; the synopsis was pre-existing. But: is the language important? Do we say "Diff creates and prints diffs in
C"?

>> +    (description
>> +     "This package provides a Go library to create and print diffs.")
>
>   (description
>    "This package provides a Go library to generate and print file
>   differences in the @code{diff} format.")

[1] https://go.dev/doc/modules/version-numbers#in-development

-- 
Katherine

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.