GNU bug report logs - #60835
[PATCH 0/5] Lisp-Stat

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>

Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 19:12:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #107 received at 60835 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
Cc: 60835 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] gnu: Add cl-variates.
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 18:36:06 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de> skribis:

> * gnu/packages/lisp-xyz.scm (cl-variates, ecl-cl-variates,
> sbcl-cl-variates): New variables.
>
> Hi Guillaume, thanks for the review.
>
> Here is version 4 of the patch set rebased against the latest master commit as of now.

Hi,
It looks like the patches are still based on a different branch.
They end with:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
+
 (define-public sbcl-seria
   (let ((commit "2bba04dc6abdc0b85a511cae9c460942e2ad305a")
         (revision "0"))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

whereas if they were based on the master branch they would end with:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
+
 ;;;
 ;;; Avoid adding new packages to the end of this file. To reduce the chances
 ;;; of a merge conflict, place them above by existing packages with similar
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

What git command did you use to make the patch series?
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 145 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.