GNU bug report logs -
#60735
[PATCH 0/2] Implement etc-hosts-service-type
Previous Next
Reported by: Bruno Victal <mirai <at> makinata.eu>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 17:27:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #38 received at 60735 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 2023-01-23 22:37, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Bruno Victal <mirai <at> makinata.eu> skribis:
>
>> ---
>>
>> WIP, the ganeti tests fail because host-name is added as an alias of localhost.
>
> Before these patches, ‘host-name’ was already an alias of ‘localhost’.
> Is there something else interfering?
In some cases, it's not desired for host-name to be an alias of localhost.
The ganeti tests did this by passing a hosts-file file-like object where
host-name wasn't an alias of localhost.
I've brainstormed a bit on this and here's what I thought:
Approach 1 (DOESN'T WORK):
* hosts-service-type in essential-services (gnu/systems.scm), default value:
127.0.0.1 localhost
::1 localhost
* simple-service extension on base-services (gnu/services/base.scm):
\\FLOPS since both /etc/hosts and /etc/hostname are provisioned with activation-service-type.
This means we can't write /etc/hosts AFTER /etc/hostname or host-name-service-type is ready.
Approach 2:
* NO /etc/hosts in essential-services (is this possible?)
* is an absent /etc/hosts (or absent %base-services) a valid OS?
* Value set in %base-services, hosts-service-type as a ONE-SHOT shepherd service.
* Can be changed with modify-services.
* It's a one-shot shepherd service since we're depending on /etc/hostname which is activation-service-type. (we're depending on either etc-service-type or host-name-service-type)
Approach 3:
* Do not set our hostname as an alias of localhost by default.
* Manpage doesn't seem to make this mandatory, in fact, our hostname can point to any IP. (it says 'often', not 'mandatory')
* We only set localhost name.
* Is this mandatory? If not, there might be cases where this entry is undesired.
>
>> + (simple-service 'block-facebook-hosts hosts-service-type
>> + (let ((host-pairs
>> + (filter-map
>> + (lambda (x)
>> + (and (not (or (string-null? x)
>> + (string-prefix? "#" x)))
>> + (remove string-null?
>> + (string-split
>> + x
>> + char-set:whitespace))))
>> + (string-split %facebook-host-aliases #\newline))))
>> + (map (match-lambda
>> + ((addr name)
>> + (host addr name)))
>> + host-pairs)))
>
> It doesn’t matter because it’s removed in the commit that follows I
> think using ‘string-tokenize’ instead of ‘string-split’ may bring
> simplifications.
It was added because otherwise the "split" commits would seem to be missing some context.
I can leave it as is, delete it here or try your suggestion.
>> +++ b/gnu/system.scm
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>> ;;; Copyright © 2020, 2022 Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
>> ;;; Copyright © 2021 Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
>> ;;; Copyright © 2021 raid5atemyhomework <raid5atemyhomework <at> protonmail.com>
>> +;;; Copyright © 2023 Bruno Victal <mirai <at> makinata.eu>
>> ;;;
>> ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
>> ;;;
>> @@ -31,6 +32,7 @@
>> ;;; along with GNU Guix. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>>
>> (define-module (gnu system)
>> + #:use-module (guix discovery)
>
> Do we really need this module?
IIRC this was for the deprecated procedures to work. Can they work without this module?
Cheers,
Bruno
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 100 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.