GNU bug report logs -
#60725
support the special '~' character in our version parser
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 60725 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#60725
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 11 Jan 2023 03:24:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 11 Jan 2023 03:24:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi Guix,
If you run 'guix lint emacs-enh-ruby-mode', it'll print this:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
emacs-enh-ruby-mode <at> 2019111-0.7e76d75: can be upgraded to 20191111
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
That's wrong; it should know that something that starts with the tag and
has trailing characters is considered newer. Actually, it should
probably implement the RPM scheme used in Debian also, so that an RC can
be understood as older than the final release. The scheme uses the
tilde character (~) as a way to specify that the version is lower than
the number that precedes the tilde.
See the test case here for a "specification" (there may be a better
place):
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/blob/4afe2d14d33db82ccb41c0a8d5eb1a4db90762fc/tests/rpmvercmp.at#L94
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#60725
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:25:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 60725 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Guix,
>
> If you run 'guix lint emacs-enh-ruby-mode', it'll print this:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> emacs-enh-ruby-mode <at> 2019111-0.7e76d75: can be upgraded to 20191111
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
In this particular case, 2019111 seems to have been a typo in the first
place. (It misses out on a '1' in our package record).
AFAIK, any sane versioning scheme would assert that 20191111 > 2019111-anything.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#60725
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:44:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 60725 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
retitle 60725 support the special '~' character in our version parser
thanks
Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org> writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> If you run 'guix lint emacs-enh-ruby-mode', it'll print this:
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> emacs-enh-ruby-mode <at> 2019111-0.7e76d75: can be upgraded to 20191111
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> In this particular case, 2019111 seems to have been a typo in the first
> place. (It misses out on a '1' in our package record).
Thanks! With this typo fixed, 'guix lint' doesn't suggest a downgrade
anymore.
> AFAIK, any sane versioning scheme would assert that 20191111 > 2019111-anything.
That's not currently the case with Guix. Guix package version strings
are documented has having the requirement to be 'monotonically
increasing', so '43.rc3' as used by GNOME is seen by Guix as newer than
'43', the final release.
I'll keep this bug open (and retitle it), because implementing ~ would
be useful (GNOME makes use of that scheme, and it's understood by rpm,
dpkg, pkg-config, etc.).
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Changed bug title to 'support the special '~' character in our version parser' from 'guix lint thinks 2019111-0.7e76d75 is older than 20191111'
Request was from
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:44:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#60725
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 11 Jan 2023 14:35:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #16 received at 60725 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
> retitle 60725 support the special '~' character in our version parser
> thanks
>
> Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org> writes:
>
>> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Guix,
>>>
>>> If you run 'guix lint emacs-enh-ruby-mode', it'll print this:
>>>
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>> emacs-enh-ruby-mode <at> 2019111-0.7e76d75: can be upgraded to 20191111
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>> In this particular case, 2019111 seems to have been a typo in the first
>> place. (It misses out on a '1' in our package record).
>
> Thanks! With this typo fixed, 'guix lint' doesn't suggest a downgrade
> anymore.
>
>> AFAIK, any sane versioning scheme would assert that 20191111 > 2019111-anything.
>
> That's not currently the case with Guix. Guix package version strings
> are documented has having the requirement to be 'monotonically
> increasing', so '43.rc3' as used by GNOME is seen by Guix as newer than
> '43', the final release.
I agree with your assesment, but note that my example (again) had one
"1" less, in which case Guix does the right thing :-).
>
> I'll keep this bug open (and retitle it), because implementing ~ would
> be useful (GNOME makes use of that scheme, and it's understood by rpm,
> dpkg, pkg-config, etc.).
Fixing our versioning code so "123" > "123-alpha2" will also bring us
(more) in line with Semantic Versioning.
- Jelle
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#60725
; Package
guix
.
(Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:01:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #19 received at 60725 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org> writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> retitle 60725 support the special '~' character in our version parser
>> thanks
>>
>> Jelle Licht <jlicht <at> fsfe.org> writes:
[...]
>> That's not currently the case with Guix. Guix package version strings
>> are documented has having the requirement to be 'monotonically
>> increasing', so '43.rc3' as used by GNOME is seen by Guix as newer than
>> '43', the final release.
>
> I agree with your assesment, but note that my example (again) had one
> "1" less, in which case Guix does the right thing :-).
Ah! I failed to correctly read that version number again, eh!
--
Thanks,
Maxim
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 152 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.