GNU bug report logs -
#60669
Linux Emacs 27.1 custom toolbar icons
Previous Next
Reported by: David McCracken <davidm <at> ixont.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2023 23:40:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 3 Sep 2023 02:41:11 -0700
with message-id <CADwFkmmmRp7XHG5m2BHqL7AKLGTv7fjw5CYwNH19YjirFumzJg <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#60669: Linux Emacs 27.1 custom toolbar icons
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #60669,
regarding Linux Emacs 27.1 custom toolbar icons
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
60669: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60669
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
The Emacs 27.1 provided (apt-get install) by Ubuntu 22.04 reduces
support for custom toolbar icons. It only works with B/W pbm files and
only if located in /usr/share/emacs/27.1/etc/images and only if there
isn't an xpm file with the same base name. i.e. name.pbm works but not
if there is a name.xpm in the directory. If these conditions are not met
nothing is displayed.
This does not seem to be baked into Emacs 27.1 because these
restrictions don't exist in Windows Emacs 27.1. They are also not
inherent in Linux because they don't exist in Linux Emacs 26.1.
There are two serious problems with these seemingly unnecessary changes.
B/W icons reduce not just the aesthetic quality but also subtle visual
clues that help an icon convey its meaning. Accepting only icons in the
version-numbered installation directory means that custom icons are
wiped out by upgrading Emacs.
The installer program I provide with my Emacs library stores its (xpm)
icons in ~/icons (a directory created by my installer). My library
accesses these by e.g.
(tool-bar-add-item "~/icons/lxa-pin"
Linux Emacs 27.1 is the only version in which this does not work. To
test whether it does not like that the directory is relatively insecure,
I tried moving my icons to /usr/local but they were still ignored. In
all other versions, adding the xpm extension to the reference causes it
to fail but I tested this anyway and it accomplished nothing.
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2023 13:01:26 -0800
>> From: David McCracken <davidm <at> ixont.com>
>>
>> The Emacs 27.1 provided (apt-get install) by Ubuntu 22.04 reduces
>> support for custom toolbar icons. It only works with B/W pbm files and
>> only if located in /usr/share/emacs/27.1/etc/images and only if there
>> isn't an xpm file with the same base name. i.e. name.pbm works but not
>> if there is a name.xpm in the directory. If these conditions are not met
>> nothing is displayed.
>>
>> This does not seem to be baked into Emacs 27.1 because these
>> restrictions don't exist in Windows Emacs 27.1. They are also not
>> inherent in Linux because they don't exist in Linux Emacs 26.1.
>>
>> There are two serious problems with these seemingly unnecessary changes.
>> B/W icons reduce not just the aesthetic quality but also subtle visual
>> clues that help an icon convey its meaning. Accepting only icons in the
>> version-numbered installation directory means that custom icons are
>> wiped out by upgrading Emacs.
>>
>> The installer program I provide with my Emacs library stores its (xpm)
>> icons in ~/icons (a directory created by my installer). My library
>> accesses these by e.g.
>> (tool-bar-add-item "~/icons/lxa-pin"
>> Linux Emacs 27.1 is the only version in which this does not work. To
>> test whether it does not like that the directory is relatively insecure,
>> I tried moving my icons to /usr/local but they were still ignored. In
>> all other versions, adding the xpm extension to the reference causes it
>> to fail but I tested this anyway and it accomplished nothing.
>
> Can you please show a reproducible recipe, starting from "emacs -Q",
> that exhibits the problem you are describing? I don't think I
> understand what exactly doesn't work in your case.
>
> Also, please use "M-x report-emacs-bug" to post the details, as that
> command collects important details about the Emacs build configuration
> that make investigation easier.
>
> Thanks.
More information was requested, but none was given within 9 months, so
I'm closing this bug. If this is still an issue, please reply to this
email (use "Reply to all" in your email client) and we can reopen the
bug report.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 254 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.