GNU bug report logs - #60623
30.0.50; Add forward-sentence with tree sitter support

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: "60623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <60623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>, "casouri <at> gmail.com" <casouri <at> gmail.com>, "eliz <at> gnu.org" <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>, "monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca" <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: bug#60623: 30.0.50; Add forward-sentence with tree sitter support
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 09:01:23 +0100

Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net> writes:

>>>> So is this to be considered an improvement to forward-sexp too, then?
>>>
>>> Sorry, I can't find where a lambda is set to forward-sexp-function.
>>> I only see this:
>>>
>>>   (defvar forward-sexp-function nil
>>>
>>> But if it will be set to a function later, it would be nice
>>> to define a default function as well.
>>
>> I meant the way we did with 'transpose-sexps', where there now is a
>> 'transpose-sexps-function' variable containing the factored-out earlier
>> implementation.  And by if "this is an improvement" I meant declaring a
>> specific defun as the default value for the defvar in question.  Maybe I
>> should add the same change which is now developing here there too.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I agree that 'transpose-sexps-function' could benefit from the same improvement.

Yeah, added such a change in bug#60654, as it was already reported :-)

I appreciate your feedback!

Theo

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.