GNU bug report logs - #60623
30.0.50; Add forward-sentence with tree sitter support

Previous Next

Full log

Message #68 received at 60623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
Cc: "60623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <60623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>,
 "casouri <at> gmail.com" <casouri <at> gmail.com>, "eliz <at> gnu.org" <eliz <at> gnu.org>,
 Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>,
 "monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca" <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: Re: [External] : bug#60623: 30.0.50; Add forward-sentence with tree
 sitter support
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 09:49:55 +0200

>>> So is this to be considered an improvement to forward-sexp too, then?
>>
>> Sorry, I can't find where a lambda is set to forward-sexp-function.
>> I only see this:
>>
>>   (defvar forward-sexp-function nil
>>
>> But if it will be set to a function later, it would be nice
>> to define a default function as well.
>
> I meant the way we did with 'transpose-sexps', where there now is a
> 'transpose-sexps-function' variable containing the factored-out earlier
> implementation.  And by if "this is an improvement" I meant declaring a
> specific defun as the default value for the defvar in question.  Maybe I
> should add the same change which is now developing here there too.
>
> What do you think?

I agree that 'transpose-sexps-function' could benefit from the same improvement.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.