GNU bug report logs - #60623
30.0.50; Add forward-sentence with tree sitter support

Previous Next

Full log

Message #44 received at 60623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
Cc: "60623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <60623 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>,
 "casouri <at> gmail.com" <casouri <at> gmail.com>, "eliz <at> gnu.org" <eliz <at> gnu.org>,
 Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>,
 "monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca" <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: Re: [External] : bug#60623: 30.0.50; Add forward-sentence with tree
 sitter support
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2023 19:30:48 +0200

>>> >A good practice is to name such a function
>>> >e.g. forward-sentence-default-function.
>>>
>>> Is this practice used anywhere else? Iirc
>>> forward-sexp-function doesn't follow that
>>> practice.
>>
>>On the other hand, if the value must always
>>be a function, then having "-default-" in
>>the name makes sense.
>
> So is this to be considered an improvement to forward-sexp too, then?

Sorry, I can't find where a lambda is set to forward-sexp-function.
I only see this:

  (defvar forward-sexp-function nil

But if it will be set to a function later, it would be nice
to define a default function as well.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.