Subject: bug#60620: [PATCH] copy.c: replace set_acl() with chmod_or_fchmod()

From: Ondrej Valousek <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 06:38:11 +0000

Not sure if I understand what you talk about.
Qset_acl() is not copying any ACLs.
How it could affect the code change we do to the qcopy_acl()? There is no change there...

Zasláno z Outlooku pro Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
________________________________
From: Paul Eggert <[email-masked]>
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2023 12:18:59 AM
To: Ondrej Valousek <[email-masked]>; [email-masked] <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: bug#60620: [PATCH] copy.c: replace set_acl() with chmod_or_fchmod()

On 2023-01-08 11:20, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> No, these two changes are (from the functional point of view) independent - i.e. acl handling will work regardless of the order these 2 are applied.
> The only difference is, that once both are applied, we could link coreutils w/o libacl

If the change quoted below is applied, but the Gnulib change is not,
then ACLs won't be copied. So I don't see how the two changes are
independent.

> Zasláno z Outlooku pro Android<https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2FAAb9ysg&data=05%7C01%7Condrej.valousek.xm%40renesas.com%7C170dde217c084a2a39e208daf1cebaff%7C53d82571da1947e49cb4625a166a4a2a%7C0%7C0%7C638088167448100493%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=U865sX5YrDSgZhGguA4b0p5i7oqeQ1OS%2BiTbqJMNiew%3D&reserved=0>
> ________________________________
> From: Paul Eggert <[email-masked]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 8, 2023 12:53:37 AM
> To: Ondrej Valousek <[email-masked]>; [email-masked] <[email-masked]>
> Subject: Re: bug#60620: [PATCH] copy.c: replace set_acl() with chmod_or_fchmod()
>
> On 2023-01-06 07:23, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
>> -          && qset_acl (dst_name, dest_desc, restrictive_temp_mode) != 0)
>> +          && chmod_or_fchmod (dst_name, dest_desc, restrictive_temp_mode) != 0)
>
> Doesn't this sort of change require the qcopy-acl.c change in Gnulib? If
> so, we need to wait for that Gnulib change before installing this
> change, right? Otherwise we won't be copying ACLs correctly.
>