GNU bug report logs - #60564
[PATCH] scripts: refresh: Add -T option.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>

Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 01:12:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>, jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
Cc: 60564 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#60564] [PATCH] scripts: refresh: Add -T option.
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2023 11:51:37 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi jgart and Maxim,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Nothing immediately, but we'd have to honor T forever as it'd be part of
> the public CLI, loosing that letter for something more useful that may
> yet to appear.
>
> Probably an overblown concern, to be honest, eh.
>
> I'll see what Josselin says about it, otherwise I'll push it soon.

I'm on the fence as well, it doesn't seem like something you would use
very often, compared to eg. `-l` or `-u`, especially if you mention that
you would use the option more often if this was implemented (I'd expect
more of a "I use it all the time but typing it is annoying"). `guix
size` and `guix graph` are the more useful commands imho. What do you
use it for specifically (maybe that would help us understand the
use-case a bit more)?

At the same time, it's probably fine, we don't have many options for
`guix refresh` and it's not like dozens of them will get added overnight
(and they maybe don't deserve a short argument either).  I'll leave it
in your hands 🤠.

Best,
-- 
Josselin Poiret
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 118 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.