From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:15:34 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#60488 <60488@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#60488 <60488@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8 Reply-To: bug#60488 <60488@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 06:15:34 +0000 retitle 60488 string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8 reassign 60488 guile submitter 60488 festerdam@posteo.net severity 60488 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 02 03:53:55 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2023 08:53:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42409 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pCGZv-0005Sj-AC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 03:53:55 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40176) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pCCN9-0004Mi-Is for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2023 23:24:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pCCN9-0004EO-EO for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2023 23:24:27 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pCCN7-0003Xf-CY for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jan 2023 23:24:27 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF3CE240083 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2023 05:24:22 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1672633463; bh=ILkNpUH9Smv+Ir60djtO1UEGXKK2U82hIMr+6SpvERI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=SYuspwssHHNCSnjRpmXVwnvVkmjpaZEEoCOuiCpFkH3m1KuFWR7gGJtB4T4UZnPbe MYMUwZAoCGvf3HZwMpdEY1M9cAkGQyiA+ojx8aWvG4Wn4aRujJJRY673fPtzOlVenA a6WyryF0SItRPbXQ3/OYqtAdIOnBq8dMDM+L/AXYJdccXkh5QHd3j7q5kGG+cmE72s 8ThdMqGEBYjYdge90ye+B8nz3ogruFUhWMljroG/z/mGFPdp1ZqIL/yzJQuoJ53/mg GM48chYxBrkjKz/IJGBsQ++5NGbQ9D7v4MbaNC7KM1Mv5W3sLsbeJEklBW80JY+a7w kfay9EukK0wfw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NljS62jSBz6tmB for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2023 05:24:22 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 04:24:22 +0000 From: festerdam@posteo.net To: bug-guile@gnu.org Subject: Re: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2df76f461d737a55a19dd9c4eba8ea1a@posteo.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=festerdam@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 03:53:53 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) On 02.01.2023 05:12, festerdam@posteo.net wrote: > The following code results in a segmentation fault on Guile > 3.0.8-deb+3.0.8-2 (obtained from the Debian repositories): > (string-ref "my string" -3) > > gdb's backtrace is the following: > > #0 0x00007ffff7f1bcc5 in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #1 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #2 0x00007ffff7e97b29 in scm_apply_0 () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #3 0x00007ffff7f15966 in scm_throw () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #4 0x00007ffff7f174e9 in scm_ithrow () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #5 0x00007ffff7e94735 in scm_error_scm () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #6 0x00007ffff7e94790 in scm_error () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #7 0x00007ffff7ee19e7 in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #8 0x00007ffff7ee208b in scm_to_uint64 () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #9 0x00007ffff7f1c5e4 in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #10 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #11 0x00007ffff7e93a97 in scm_primitive_eval () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #12 0x00007ffff7e99a86 in scm_eval () > from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #13 0x00007ffff7ef91c6 in scm_shell () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #14 0x00007ffff7ea865c in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #15 0x00007ffff7e91f6a in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #16 0x00007ffff7f194e8 in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #17 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #18 0x00007ffff7e936ea in scm_call_2 () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #19 0x00007ffff7f42292 in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #20 0x00007ffff7f0ff4f in scm_c_catch () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #21 0x00007ffff7e942e6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #22 0x00007ffff7f14b89 in ?? () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #23 0x00007ffff7c190e7 in GC_call_with_stack_base () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgc.so.1 > #24 0x00007ffff7f0fe68 in scm_with_guile () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #25 0x00007ffff7eb1185 in scm_boot_guile () from > /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 > #26 0x000055555555510f in ?? () > #27 0x00007ffff7c9918a in __libc_start_call_main > (main=main@entry=0x5555555550b0, argc=argc@entry=1, > argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffe0b8) at > ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58 > #28 0x00007ffff7c99245 in __libc_start_main_impl (main=0x5555555550b0, > argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe0b8, init=, fini= out>, rtld_fini=, stack_end=0x7fffffffe0a8) at > ../csu/libc-start.c:381 > #29 0x00005555555551aa in ?? () Sorry, didn't see #59874. This bug report is a duplicate of that bug. Therefore this should be closed. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jan 02 04:01:48 2023 Received: (at 60488-close) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2023 09:01:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42432 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pCGhX-0005hJ-MA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 04:01:48 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.134]:37971) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pCGhV-0005h5-JL for 60488-close@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 04:01:46 -0500 Received: from smtpclient.apple ([37.167.18.137]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue010 [212.227.15.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MtwEO-1oxt781ujE-00uML6; Mon, 02 Jan 2023 10:01:38 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Jean Abou Samra Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: bug#60488: string-ref segfaults with n < 0 on Guile 3.0.8 Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 10:01:26 +0100 Message-Id: References: <2df76f461d737a55a19dd9c4eba8ea1a@posteo.net> In-Reply-To: <2df76f461d737a55a19dd9c4eba8ea1a@posteo.net> To: festerdam@posteo.net X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (20A380) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:0v5qMynZ51pzMpKzsB547mxHdRt4DlMvKBmKe9fUNxa8wv3jNkl oMP8goqkjZQw1G+rfaKA7Fvoc12wug3X2P0vuz4JT2ejzq/7B9GP/sivd+2189DINhbpRow nwh4vcJSS9FpLj2R1NEdzEjtNYF2Yuv9sAyqj9Az1bt8qFuvV8urYnItVPq/4c+ouzKQ4+W R2FNqanmpaArZ3Fy1KdZA== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:m58ZlsRD+aE=;ahCK5XZ74g6TpBDGNpzNdRXL08F viJvmFryuEs00pDFAaHzv0zfBIbBkvTR+y7UY0HXnJCW7LpIUwTwHDri8XEjm/WCE4EZmeq0q wEEm7+H4wDL/DTECpSqFHVK3DKj50z5Tnx9Q+x0U1LTVC3dplV3ctt6cSg15/PxZ8m/v2W39+ /tQ8cRxlxObsq0pEEU4cLEZq9C2kW05Q0V2WF1xQW3tWZyXr4cNo0rUry9V/CapOPWFTGbhac O8IfoedajXLsOZb3813+N05zZPafHVeZuQ93aiLCyAFp5PKRCItN6uqjRGcVQInuFtZHoCskB C9CLIWDyLI4QjfWkA+qt3RQ5PaYKADybH12n1STXEOZuPE9GBwahLfnC55MpJzbdKSkWn7DMA dxja69QT9yevMyniELRA40ZLeuklspVYP8XxkLtEIPKxeMSZOaRDETFsgaQfo0Qk5pFi14PoY 78tXoS7INfOIeFqVDSTWHZRBFZlqBq9iHJkCKQgDuqRbtr7UX2QjsZwmUUfPuln9ShD/AkNHe LT+6QbMmIIuJXCh5NSqw14CQVkpRGEcyz++mUzHouMXeMrShYlNTtaZGBl08pz+c48KsMvv2T TR+oc214iz5UPJdr8aMg8iWr925bg6o75Bwz8re8mcr766vRAXNTFQ8okFTObG/wDOy7FrIlx HhpP9rlTrUAkr/25TW+6Eb/7rXe2G7wF4gpcQ9Jfvg== X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 60488-close Cc: 60488-close@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > Le 2 janv. 2023 =C3=A0 09:54, festerdam@posteo.net a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > =EF=BB=BFOn 02.01.2023 05:12, festerdam@posteo.net wrote: >> The following code results in a segmentation fault on Guile >> 3.0.8-deb+3.0.8-2 (obtained from the Debian repositories): >> (string-ref "my string" -3) >> gdb's backtrace is the following: >> #0 0x00007ffff7f1bcc5 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.s= o.1 >> #1 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #2 0x00007ffff7e97b29 in scm_apply_0 () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #3 0x00007ffff7f15966 in scm_throw () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #4 0x00007ffff7f174e9 in scm_ithrow () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #5 0x00007ffff7e94735 in scm_error_scm () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #6 0x00007ffff7e94790 in scm_error () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #7 0x00007ffff7ee19e7 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.s= o.1 >> #8 0x00007ffff7ee208b in scm_to_uint64 () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #9 0x00007ffff7f1c5e4 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.s= o.1 >> #10 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #11 0x00007ffff7e93a97 in scm_primitive_eval () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #12 0x00007ffff7e99a86 in scm_eval () >> from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #13 0x00007ffff7ef91c6 in scm_shell () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #14 0x00007ffff7ea865c in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.s= o.1 >> #15 0x00007ffff7e91f6a in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.s= o.1 >> #16 0x00007ffff7f194e8 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.s= o.1 >> #17 0x00007ffff7f26c49 in scm_call_n () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #18 0x00007ffff7e936ea in scm_call_2 () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #19 0x00007ffff7f42292 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.s= o.1 >> #20 0x00007ffff7f0ff4f in scm_c_catch () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #21 0x00007ffff7e942e6 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #22 0x00007ffff7f14b89 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.s= o.1 >> #23 0x00007ffff7c190e7 in GC_call_with_stack_base () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgc.so.1 >> #24 0x00007ffff7f0fe68 in scm_with_guile () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #25 0x00007ffff7eb1185 in scm_boot_guile () from >> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libguile-3.0.so.1 >> #26 0x000055555555510f in ?? () >> #27 0x00007ffff7c9918a in __libc_start_call_main >> (main=3Dmain@entry=3D0x5555555550b0, argc=3Dargc@entry=3D1, >> argv=3Dargv@entry=3D0x7fffffffe0b8) at >> ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58 >> #28 0x00007ffff7c99245 in __libc_start_main_impl (main=3D0x5555555550b0, >> argc=3D1, argv=3D0x7fffffffe0b8, init=3D, fini=3D> out>, rtld_fini=3D, stack_end=3D0x7fffffffe0a8) at >> ../csu/libc-start.c:381 >> #29 0x00005555555551aa in ?? () >=20 > Sorry, didn't see #59874. This bug report is a duplicate of that bug. Ther= efore this should be closed. >=20 >=20 >=20 From unknown Wed Jun 18 23:15:34 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator