GNU bug report logs - #60467
30.0.50; primitive-undo: Changes to be undone by function different from announced

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>

Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2023 13:40:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 30.0.50

Done: Gregory Heytings <gregory <at> heytings.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Gregory Heytings <gregory <at> heytings.org>
Cc: 60467 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, frederic.giquel <at> laposte.net, yantar92 <at> posteo.net, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, acm <at> muc.de
Subject: bug#60467: 30.0.50; primitive-undo: Changes to be undone by function different from announced
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:41:34 +0300
> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 11:28:33 +0000
> From: Gregory Heytings <gregory <at> heytings.org>
> cc: 60467 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, frederic.giquel <at> laposte.net, yantar92 <at> posteo.net, 
>     monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, acm <at> muc.de
> 
> > Can we please finish handling of this issue?
> 
> It's not clear to me what you want: do you want to fix this issue on the 
> emacs-29 branch or on the master branch?

I suggested to install your fix on master.

> We now have two bug reports on this (the one by Frédéric Giquel in
> this bug, and the one by Eason Huang in bug#64989).  I just verified
> (again) that the Fix-combine-change-call-with-timestamps patch fixes
> these two recipes.

If bug#64989 could be fixed by a simpler, safer change (which remains
to be seen), we might do that on emacs-29.  If not, at least we will
have this fixed in Emacs 30.

Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 334 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.