GNU bug report logs - #60467
30.0.50; primitive-undo: Changes to be undone by function different from announced

Previous Next

Full log

Message #151 received at 60467 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: gregory <at> heytings.org
Cc: 60467 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, frederic.giquel <at> laposte.net, yantar92 <at> posteo.net,
 monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, acm <at> muc.de
Subject: Re: bug#60467: 30.0.50;
 primitive-undo: Changes to be undone by function different from
 announced
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 10:38:18 +0300

Ping! Ping!

Can we please finish handling of this issue?

> Cc: 60467 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, frederic.giquel <at> laposte.net, yantar92 <at> posteo.net,
>  monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, acm <at> muc.de
> Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 10:46:30 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> 
> Ping!
> 
> > Cc: 60467 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, frederic.giquel <at> laposte.net, yantar92 <at> posteo.net,
> >  monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, acm <at> muc.de
> > Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2023 17:27:52 +0300
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> > 
> > > Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2023 14:14:11 +0000
> > > From: Gregory Heytings <gregory <at> heytings.org>
> > > cc: 60467 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, frederic.giquel <at> laposte.net, yantar92 <at> posteo.net, 
> > >     monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, acm <at> muc.de
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >> Well, that bug was already discussed at length six months ago, and the 
> > > >> minimal change that was in the end installed (59c3c53efa) introduced a 
> > > >> new bug.  Should we design another minimal change, at the risk of 
> > > >> introducing another bug?  ISTM that the safe thing to do is the 
> > > >> refactoring that was suggested.
> > > >
> > > > If there's no safer way than the refactoring suggested back then, we 
> > > > will have to stay with this regression in Emacs 29.1 and install a 
> > > > better fix only on master.  After all, the fact that buffer-modified-p 
> > > > is not undone is a minor inconvenience at best.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > Indeed.  A safer way probably exists, but I would not dare writing that 
> > > patch.  I believe Stefan is in a better position to write it.
> > 
> > How about installing your patch, which you proposed back then, on
> > master, then?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.