GNU bug report logs -
#60467
30.0.50; primitive-undo: Changes to be undone by function different from announced
Previous Next
Reported by: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2023 13:40:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 30.0.50
Done: Gregory Heytings <gregory <at> heytings.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #148 received at 60467 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ping!
> Cc: 60467 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, frederic.giquel <at> laposte.net, yantar92 <at> posteo.net,
> monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, acm <at> muc.de
> Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2023 17:27:52 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
>
> > Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2023 14:14:11 +0000
> > From: Gregory Heytings <gregory <at> heytings.org>
> > cc: 60467 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, frederic.giquel <at> laposte.net, yantar92 <at> posteo.net,
> > monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, acm <at> muc.de
> >
> >
> > >> Well, that bug was already discussed at length six months ago, and the
> > >> minimal change that was in the end installed (59c3c53efa) introduced a
> > >> new bug. Should we design another minimal change, at the risk of
> > >> introducing another bug? ISTM that the safe thing to do is the
> > >> refactoring that was suggested.
> > >
> > > If there's no safer way than the refactoring suggested back then, we
> > > will have to stay with this regression in Emacs 29.1 and install a
> > > better fix only on master. After all, the fact that buffer-modified-p
> > > is not undone is a minor inconvenience at best.
> > >
> >
> > Indeed. A safer way probably exists, but I would not dare writing that
> > patch. I believe Stefan is in a better position to write it.
>
> How about installing your patch, which you proposed back then, on
> master, then?
>
>
>
>
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 333 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.