GNU bug report logs - #60410
[PATCH 0/7] mumi: Boolean prefixes in xapian indexing and others

Previous Next

Package: mumi;

Reported by: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>

Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 20:19:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#60410: closed ([PATCH 0/7] mumi: Boolean prefixes in xapian
 indexing and others)
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2023 12:15:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 01 Jan 2023 13:14:06 +0100
with message-id <87mt725u51.fsf <at> elephly.net>
and subject line Re: [PATCH 1/7] xapian: Index several terms as boolean and without positions.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #60410,
regarding [PATCH 0/7] mumi: Boolean prefixes in xapian indexing and others
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
60410: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=60410
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org,
	Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
Cc: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] mumi: Boolean prefixes in xapian indexing and others
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 20:18:09 +0000
Hi Ricardo,

This is a patchset that has been sleeping for some time in my local
git repo. So, I thought it was about time to send it over!

The main change is that some xapian prefixes should be indexed as
boolean prefixes. This makes the use of an implicit AND operator
unneccessary and lets xapian do the natural thing of ordering results
by relevance. I believe this improves the search significantly. Also,
since we retrieve search results by relevance, we can offload limiting
of search results to xapian. Thus, we improve performance as well.

For this patchset to be useful, mumi's xapian index will have to be
rebuilt. In general, it is good to periodically rebuilt the xapian
index from scratch.

Regards,
Arun

Arun Isaac (7):
  xapian: Index several terms as boolean and without positions.
  xapian: Declare some prefixes as boolean.
  xapian: Do not override the default OR implicit query operator.
  messages: Remove unused set intersection feature in search-bugs.
  messages: Offload limiting search results to xapian.
  cache: Specify that cache! returns the cached value.
  xapian: Preserve order of search results.

 mumi/cache.scm    |   3 +-
 mumi/messages.scm |  29 ++++--------
 mumi/xapian.scm   | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 3 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

-- 
2.38.1



[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
Cc: 60410-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] xapian: Index several terms as boolean and without
 positions.
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2023 13:14:06 +0100
Hi Arun,

>>     worker error: (keyword-argument-error #f Unrecognized keyword ()
>>     (#:positions?))
>
> Oops! It looks like I have been working with some unpublished
> guile-xapian code. I have pushed those guile-xapian commits, released
> guile-xapian 0.3.0 and updated the Guix guile-xapian package. Hopefully,
> it should work now. Could you try again?

Thank you, thisk works!
I applied the changes.

-- 
Ricardo


This bug report was last modified 1 year and 158 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.