GNU bug report logs - #60397
29.0.60; c++-ts-mode could report better defun names

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
To: Knut Anders Hatlen <kahatlen <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 60397 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#60397: 29.0.60; c++-ts-mode could report better defun names
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2023 16:27:08 -0800

Knut Anders Hatlen <kahatlen <at> gmail.com> writes:

> The defun names reported by c++-ts-mode could still need a couple of
> improvements:
>
> 1) In a buffer with c++-ts-mode and which-function-mode enabled, and
> this content:
>
> struct S {
>   int f1(int x) {
>     return x + 1;
>   }
>   int g1(int x);
> };
>
> int S::g1(int x) {
>   return x + 1;
> }
>
> Inside the inline f1 function definition, which-function-mode shows
> "S.f1". But inside the out-of-line g1 function definition, it shows
> "n/a" instead of "S.g1". (Not limited to structs. Classes have the same
> problem.)
>
> 2) Namespaces are not handled. Given this content:
>
> namespace n {
> int f1(int x) {
>   return x + 1;
> }
> }
>
> namespace {
> int f2(int x) {
>   return x + 1;
> }
> }
>
> Inside the f1 and f2 function bodies, which-function-mode shows "f1" and
> "f2", respectively. It would be better if it showed "n.f1" for the
> former, and perhaps something like "(anonymous).f2" for the latter.

Thanks for the report. I’ll work on this :-)

Yuan

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.