Subject: Re: bug#60333: [PATCH] whitespace: Update bob, eob markers in base and indirect buffers

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 09:44:22 -0500

>> "Expose" is the wrong term, because we don't have that info ready to
>> be exposed.  We'd either have to create&maintain that list, or compute
>> it on-demand when requested.
[...]
> 1. Maintain internal indirect buffer list associated with buffers in C

That's the "create&maintain that list" option.
Personally I don't like it: I'd like to reduce the amount of support we
provide in C for indirect buffers rather than increase it.

        Stefan