GNU bug report logs - #60266
[PATCH] gnu: Add form.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Antero Mejr <antero <at> mailbox.org>

Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 01:17:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo, patch

Done: Eric Bavier <bavier <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #34 received at 60266 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Antero Mejr <antero <at> mailbox.org>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 60266 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eric Bavier <bavier <at> posteo.net>
Subject: Re: [bug#60266] [PATCH] gnu: Add form.
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 18:53:58 +0000
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Test failures should also be fixed at build time.  Other than that, you
> could also try to fix the memory leak that causes the failure via a
> patch.

Fixed the test failure at build time in v3.

>> > Guix usually assumes `SSE2` capabilities for x86_64 targets, iirc. 
> It does, but not for i386 to i686, which also often see sse2 flags in 
> build systems.

I did some benchmarks on a few workloads with millions of terms. The
"tunable" optimizations didn't consistently improve the
performance. Sometimes it would be a couple percent faster, sometimes
slower. So I didn't mark the package as tunable.

>> I used the other homepage so people can skip the weird "license
>> agreement" page at https://www.nikhef.nl/~form/.
> Calling the GPL a license agreement is weird, and it doesn't help that 
> https://www.nikhef.nl/~form/maindir/ also refers to it.  Perhaps we can
> raise an issue about that upstream?

I would prefer not to bother upstream further regarding the website,
since I already had to ask them to change an invalid license statement
in a file header (which they did).




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 60 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.