GNU bug report logs - #60237
30.0.50; tree sitter core dumps when I edebug view a node

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Mickey Petersen <mickey <at> masteringemacs.org>

Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 12:30:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 30.0.50

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Mickey Petersen <mickey <at> masteringemacs.org>
To: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 60237 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#60237: 30.0.50; tree sitter core dumps when I edebug view a node
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 09:41:18 +0000
Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com> writes:

>> GC has historically never called xmalloc, so the profiler will
>> likely
>> crash upon growing the mark stack as well.  I guess another
>> important
>> question is why ts_delete_parser is calling xmalloc.
>>
>
>> As you see, when we call ts_tree_delete, it calls
>> ts_subtree_release,
>> which in turn calls malloc (redirected into our xmalloc).  Is this
>> expected?  Can you look in the tree-sitter sources and verify that
>> this is OK?
>
> I had a look, and it seems legit. In tree-sitter, a TSTree (or more
> precisely, a Subtree) is just some inlined data plus a refcounted
> pointer to the complete data. This way multiple trees share common
> subtrees/nodes. Eg, when incrementally parsing, you pass in an old
> tree and get a new tree, these two trees will share the unchanged part
> of the tree.

Would that mean we could possibly preserve node instances -- either the real TS ones, or an Emacs-created facsimile -- between incremental parsing? That would be useful for refactoring.




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 70 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.