GNU bug report logs - #60212
[PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-fzf.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>

Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 03:30:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 60212 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 60212 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#60212; Package guix-patches. (Tue, 20 Dec 2022 03:30:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 20 Dec 2022 03:30:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-fzf.
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:29:16 -0600
* gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-fzf): New variable.
---
 gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
index f97775ce95..6a03d40aca 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
@@ -1283,6 +1283,38 @@ (define-public emacs-mct
     (license (list license:gpl3+
                    license:fdl1.3+)))) ; GFDLv1.3+ for the manual
 
+(define-public emacs-fzf
+  (let ((commit "21912ebc7e1084aa88c9d8b7715e782a3978ed23")
+        (revision "0"))
+    (package
+      (name "emacs-fzf")
+      (version (git-version "0.0.2" revision commit))
+      (source (origin
+                (method git-fetch)
+                (uri (git-reference
+                      (url "https://github.com/bling/fzf.el")
+                      (commit commit)))
+                (file-name (git-file-name name version))
+                (sha256
+                 (base32
+                  "0gdqjh8996hb06bnnyhi94k69mjfrzyfgq00a9s4wwagv28sqmkj"))))
+      (build-system emacs-build-system)
+      (arguments
+        (list
+         #:tests? #f ; There are no tests.
+         #:phases
+         #~(modify-phases %standard-phases
+             (add-after 'unpack 'patch-fzf-executable
+               (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys)
+                 (make-file-writable "fzf.el")
+                 (emacs-substitute-variables "fzf.el"
+                   ("fzf/executable" (search-input-file inputs "/bin/fzf"))))))))
+      (inputs (list fzf))
+      (home-page "https://github.com/bling/fzf.el")
+      (synopsis "Front-end for fzf")
+      (description "An @command{emacs} front-end for @command{fzf}.")
+      (license license:gpl3+))))
+
 (define-public emacs-minions
   (package
     (name "emacs-minions")
-- 
2.38.1





Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#60212; Package guix-patches. (Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:27:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: jgart via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 60212-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
Subject: Re: [bug#60212] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-fzf.
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:25:58 +0100
Hello,

jgart via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:

> * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-fzf): New variable.

Thank you.

> +         #~(modify-phases %standard-phases
> +             (add-after 'unpack 'patch-fzf-executable
> +               (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys)
> +                 (make-file-writable "fzf.el")

Nitpick: The expression above is usually not necessary, even though some
package definitions use it.

> +                 (emacs-substitute-variables "fzf.el"
> +                   ("fzf/executable" (search-input-file inputs "/bin/fzf"))))))))
> +      (inputs (list fzf))
> +      (home-page "https://github.com/bling/fzf.el")
> +      (synopsis "Front-end for fzf")

I expounded it a bit.

> +      (description "An @command{emacs} front-end for @command{fzf}.")

Please write full sentences in descriptions, even if upstream does not.

Also, "@command{emacs}" conveys no more information than "Emacs". So
does "@command{fzf}" vs "Fzf". The simpler the better, IMO.

Applied!

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou




Reply sent to Nicolas Goaziou <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>:
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:27:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:27:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#60212; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:55:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #16 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "jgart" <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: "Nicolas Goaziou" <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>, "jgart via Guix-patches
 via" <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 60212-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#60212] [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-fzf.
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:54:11 +0000
I keep forgetting re @command

I'll stop doing that. It has become a habit.

Thanks for the review!

It's much appreciated,

jgart

https://whereis.みんな/

December 20, 2022 4:26 AM, "Nicolas Goaziou" <mail <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> jgart via Guix-patches via <guix-patches <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
>> * gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-fzf): New variable.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
>> + #~(modify-phases %standard-phases
>> + (add-after 'unpack 'patch-fzf-executable
>> + (lambda* (#:key inputs #:allow-other-keys)
>> + (make-file-writable "fzf.el")
> 
> Nitpick: The expression above is usually not necessary, even though some
> package definitions use it.
> 
>> + (emacs-substitute-variables "fzf.el"
>> + ("fzf/executable" (search-input-file inputs "/bin/fzf"))))))))
>> + (inputs (list fzf))
>> + (home-page "https://github.com/bling/fzf.el")
>> + (synopsis "Front-end for fzf")
> 
> I expounded it a bit.
> 
>> + (description "An @command{emacs} front-end for @command{fzf}.")
> 
> Please write full sentences in descriptions, even if upstream does not.
> 
> Also, "@command{emacs}" conveys no more information than "Emacs". So
> does "@command{fzf}" vs "Fzf". The simpler the better, IMO.
> 
> Applied!
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#60212; Package guix-patches. (Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:55:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 2 years and 149 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.