GNU bug report logs - #60207
ci build of latest guix for armhf

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 18:12:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #28 received at 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>
To: Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>, control <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>, 60207 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#60207: ci build of latest guix for armhf
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 13:09:47 +0100
Julius Schwartzenberg <julius.schwartzenberg <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Op 24-12-2022 om 22:40 schreef pelzflorian (Florian Pelz):
>> If you want `guix pull` without compiling, then look at
>> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/devel/en/html_node/Channels-with-Substitutes.html>.
>
> I added the lines to my personal .config/guix/channels.scm, but guix
> pull then shows:
> guix pull: waarschuwing: could not find available substitutes at
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org
>
> And it still ends up compiling. I also tried replacing ci with
> bordeaux in the URL, but then it shows a 404.
>
> I think I'm still missing something?

Bah, it appears ci.guix.gnu.org currently just doesn’t build for
armhf-linux.  Bordeaux does not offer the needed Cuirass API.

I believe but do not know that Bordeaux does not actually build the
latest guix, just the packages.

I don’t know if offering the latest guix would even be feasible.
Probably not?  armhf builds take a long time.

Cc to Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>, Ricardo Wurmus
<rekado <at> elephly.net>.

Regards,
Florian




This bug report was last modified 13 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.