GNU bug report logs - #60197
30.0.50; beginning-of-defun broken after new treesit impl

Previous Next

Full log

Message #20 received at 60197 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
To: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 60197 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#60197: 30.0.50; beginning-of-defun broken after new treesit  impl
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 08:42:38 +0100

On 21 December 2022 07:50:04 CET, Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no> writes:
>>
>>> Hi, Yuan!
>>>
>>> It seems 'prog-fill-reindent-defun' is broken after the latest changes
>>> to treesit-beginning-of-defun.  The culprit is that we now use remap
>>> instead of setting the beginning-of-defun-function.  What is the
>>> reasoning behind that change?  Can't we just rely on the variable
>>> beginning-of-defun-function?
>>
>> Not really, end-of-defun uses beginning/end-of-defun-function in a way
>> that’s incompatible with nested defuns[1]. So if we want to support
>> navigation nested defuns reliably we need to remap the commands instead.
>> In the future (ie emacs 30), we can extend the current
>> beginning/end-of-defun to support nested defuns, then we don’t need to
>> remap the commands anymore.
>
>I see the problem now... Many other functions uses
>beginning/end-of-defun. I didn’t thought about that initially :-(
>
>But I don’t want to make big changes to beg/end-of-deun, hmmm.
>
>Yuan


I think you can set the functions and remap, right? Maybe you can force the beginning-of-defun-function variant to choose the smallest scope as a default? Or just follow the same tactic the user set?
Theo

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.