GNU bug report logs - #60075
[PATCH 00/58] New julia patches

Previous Next

Full log

Message #227 received at 60075 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 60075 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#60075] [PATCH 06/58] gnu: julia-imagebase: Update to 0.1.5.
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 19:09:39 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 07:32:00PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 at 22:35, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> wrote:
> > * gnu/packages/julia-xyz.scm (julia-imagebase): Update to 0.1.5.
> 
> >      (arguments
> >       (list #:tests? #f))    ; Cycle with ImageMagick.jl.
> 
> [...]
> 
> >      ;(native-inputs
> > -    ; `(("julia-imagemagick" ,julia-imagemagick)
> > -    ;   ("julia-offsetarrays" ,julia-offsetarrays)
> > -    ;   ("julia-testimages" ,julia-testimages)))
> > +    ; (list julia-aqua
> > +    ;       julia-documenter
> > +    ;       julia-imagefiltering
> > +    ;       julia-imageio
> > +    ;       julia-imagemagick
> > +    ;       julia-offsetarrays
> > +    ;       jula-statistics
> > +    ;       julia-testimages))
> 
> Is this change useful?  Is it for maintaining an accurate list for
> passing tests if we cut the cycle?

Its an updated list of the packages we would need for the tests to run.
I'd rather have them listed (and up to date) than missing and have to
start searching before finding out how much effort it'll be to cut the
cycle. On its own it's not a useful change, but with the actual package
upgrade it seemed like a good change to make.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.