GNU bug report logs - #60001
[PATCH] Improve completion of treesit-check-indent command

Previous Next

Full log

Message #19 received at 60001 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 60001 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>, mardani29 <at> yahoo.es
Subject: Re: bug#60001: [PATCH] Improve completion of treesit-check-indent
 command
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 13:02:23 -0700

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 15:13:54 -0800
>> Cc: Daniel Martín <mardani29 <at> yahoo.es>,
>>  60001 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>>
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> >> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:53:00 +0100
>> >> From:  Daniel Martín via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>> >>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>> >>
>> >> The treesit-check-indent command is not really related to Tree-sitter
>> >> and could be in a more general place than treesit.el.  WDYT?
>> >
>> > I agree, but then we'd need a definition for it that doesn't need
>> > tree-sitter support.  Is that easy to provide?
>> >
>> >> In any case, I have a patch to improve this command a bit by offering
>> >> more accurate completion for major modes, not Emacs commands.  I have
>> >> also tried to improve its documentation a bit.
>> >
>> > How about a read-major-mode function in subr.el?
>> >
>> > But I think all these generalizations and improvements should go to
>> > master.  On the release branch, I'd prefer to leave
>> > treesit-check-indent alone.
>>
>> Has this patch been pushed to master?
>
> No, I don't think so.
>
>> Should I close this report?
>
> If you agree with the change, please install it.

It seems like this patch was never installed.  Should it be?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.