GNU bug report logs - #59993
[PATCH 2/2] tests: Fix implicit function declaration errors

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack <at> owlfolio.org>
To: 59993 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#59993] [PATCH 2/2] tests: Fix implicit function declaration errors
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 15:58:10 -0500

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022, at 1:30 AM, Frederic Berat wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:19 PM Zack Weinberg <zack <at> owlfolio.org> wrote:
>> > --- a/t/ax/depcomp.sh
>> > +++ b/t/ax/depcomp.sh
>> > @@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ cat > sub/subfoo.h <<'END'
>> >   #include <stdio.h>
>> >   extern int subfoo (void);
>> >   END
>> > +cp sub/subfoo.h sub/subfoo.save
>> >
>> >   cat > src/baz.c <<'END'
>> >   #include "baz.h"
>> > @@ -399,8 +400,7 @@ do_test ()
>> >         && rewrite "$srcdir"/sub/subfoo.h echo 'choke me' \
>> >         && not $MAKE \
>> >         && delete "$srcdir"/sub/subfoo.h \
>> > -      && edit "$srcdir"/sub/subfoo.c -e 1d \
>> > -      && edit "$srcdir"/foo.h -e 2d \
>> > +      && mv  "$srcdir"/sub/subfoo.save "$srcdir"/sub/subfoo.h \
>> >         && make_ok \
>> >         || r='not ok'
>> >       result_ "$r" "$pfx dependency tracking works"
>>
>> These changes don't seem to have anything to do with the patch as
>> described.  They should be submitted separately.
>
> Actually, that is related. The edit removes the "#include subfoo.h"
> line from foo.h, because the subfoo.h file got overwritten earlier.
> This subfoo.h is the one that had the function declaration in ("extern
> int subfoo (void);" specifically).
> Either you need the original header back, or you need to get the
> declaration back another way. I felt this way was easier than trying
> to insert a declaration without breaking the test.

OK, I clearly don't understand what this test is doing, so I'm going to
defer to someone else to review it.

zw

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.