GNU bug report logs - #59954
29.0.50; flymake-reporting-backends documentation could use some work

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 59954 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#59954: 29.0.50; flymake-reporting-backends documentation could use some work
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 11:28:38 +0000

Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:

> The docstring of `flymake-reporting-backends' says:
>
>     Compute reporting Flymake backends in current buffer.

From all the Flymake backends present in `flymake-diagnostic-functions',
the "reporting" ones are the ones that have reported back, i.e. called
their REPORT-FN arguments.

The distinction is (mildly) useful because the Lisp function that
implements them always returns, but that doesn't necessarily mean that
the backend has arranged for the REPORT-FN callback to be called.  When
it is called, the backend enters the "reporting set".

> It is also not really explained in (info "(flymake) Troubleshooting").
> More precisely, I think it must be spelled out how it's different from
> `flymake-running-backends', and in which situations one would want to
> use one or the other.

A "running" backend is simply a backend which has been activated

> I understand that the "reporting" ones are basically the union of the
> running and disabled ones, right?

Not necessarily.  A backend may be running and we haven't yet decided if
it will become a reporting backend or a disabled one.

> "reporting"?  That is not immediately clear to me.  Surely if they are
> disabled, they are *not* reporting?  This could use some explanation.

Best explanation is in these notes and in the code.  There is partially
a historical rationale, as I was trying to keep the visual interface of
the old Flymake reasonably intact, and AFAIR it had representation for
all these states.

But there is also a fair bit of overengineering here.  It makes sense to
represent the states internally, but I've never ever found those
interactive functions useful.  Maybe a bit in the early days of
debugging... IMO you could just trash them or redesign them into a
tabulated list or something.

João

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.