From unknown Fri Jun 20 20:02:34 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#59803 <59803@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#59803 <59803@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: completion-at-point in shell buffer ignores some files Reply-To: bug#59803 <59803@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 03:02:34 +0000 retitle 59803 completion-at-point in shell buffer ignores some files reassign 59803 emacs submitter 59803 Nicolas Graner severity 59803 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 03 06:01:31 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Dec 2022 11:01:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51574 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p1QGw-00082O-OR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 06:01:30 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43104) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p1QGu-00082I-Dn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 06:01:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1QGu-0006r8-6l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 06:01:28 -0500 Received: from ouvsmtp1.octopuce.fr ([194.36.166.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1QGr-0003fn-Uv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 06:01:27 -0500 Received: from panel.vitry.ouvaton.coop (unknown [194.36.166.20]) by ouvsmtp1.octopuce.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E759BCC7 for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 12:01:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from hypra-graner (212.246.204.77.rev.sfr.net [77.204.246.212]) by panel.vitry.ouvaton.coop (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F2205E286B for ; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 12:01:20 +0100 (CET) From: Nicolas Graner To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: completion-at-point in shell buffer ignores some files Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:01:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87tu2chhtv.fsf@graner.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=194.36.166.50; envelope-from=nicolas@graner.name; helo=ouvsmtp1.octopuce.fr X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) In a *Shell* buffer, file name completion ignores file names already present on the current line. For example, if you have a file named `foo' and no other file starting with an f, when you type: $ cp f f the first completes `f' to `foo', but the second gives a `No match' error. Similarly, if you have files named foo1, foo2, foo3 and foo4, then: $ mv foo1 foo2 f shows only foo3 and foo4 in the completions buffer. Happens in emacs 29 but not in 28. Nicolas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 04 04:59:16 2022 Received: (at 59803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2022 09:59:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56622 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p1lmD-00016z-5F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 04:59:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55406) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p1lmC-00016s-Ad for 59803@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 04:59:12 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1lm5-00087P-8U; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 04:59:05 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=eq00wp9/8gKoCT9CUvDqde4WyGnpz5Bxquu1L4jl4NU=; b=NwgH9MW1DQo/ TsRU6ef42qwNYbtJtkmsXcmgQ3unPobvMzQarNuZJbGgBN34PHZqgkCI2dPj79xJdqXA5PH05/umJ EpxAzUTZ5LqL1Iats203tXQO+yt2n+gRkPtP/FyJST5VByrHc2A1YxpjQl2RGA/pbvdFNyzz12bE7 4wm1cdweeNSnZKxmUPWyp6YEmb3paL45jEtGwOcx4kdgkcUvwhERQKzC5cfxjKkhskghGwqrvGNWw mQWweicVoRXVXu90TyxVPa6UuY8Qa7B5/BHjT0p9MFTMGPF7yUOwK3iYgy4k6MNN8OxyMmSghWf5e obWjVTZYBWJxxKsDGEJC4w==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1lm2-0006dQ-VG; Sun, 04 Dec 2022 04:59:04 -0500 Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 11:58:43 +0200 Message-Id: <83pmczbics.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Nicolas Graner , Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: <87tu2chhtv.fsf@graner.name> (message from Nicolas Graner on Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:01:16 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#59803: completion-at-point in shell buffer ignores some files References: <87tu2chhtv.fsf@graner.name> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59803 Cc: 59803@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Nicolas Graner > Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:01:16 +0100 > > In a *Shell* buffer, file name completion ignores file names already > present on the current line. For example, if you have a file named `foo' > and no other file starting with an f, when you type: > > $ cp f f > > the first completes `f' to `foo', but the second gives a `No > match' error. > > Similarly, if you have files named foo1, foo2, foo3 and foo4, then: > > $ mv foo1 foo2 f > > shows only foo3 and foo4 in the completions buffer. > > Happens in emacs 29 but not in 28. This seems to be due to some changes in pcomplete.el since Emacs 28, because if you remove pcomplete-completions-at-point from the value of shell-dynamic-complete-functions, the problem goes away. Stefan, can you help here? It sounds like the culprit is some of the changes in commit 0a36671f41 and/or 88b025f815, but I'm not sure. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 10 07:52:15 2022 Received: (at 59803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2022 12:52:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42590 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p3zKx-0004CB-I2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 07:52:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36864) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p3zKt-0004C4-Pb for 59803@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 07:52:14 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3zKm-0005bx-KA; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 07:52:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=BRYy5Nt+jxiAMVTopIm3XbkPw8WLDuIrMz8Jfr2AW/I=; b=NnjZ4LnY9Rin puww94OhQOrI3+NiNQp58AvPnFcPuOFMCelFwf+xphQqPEcGUOyl9zgBANW88u1CDdpzyar7Sb43l VRWf7msvrgPvxUYe6lVQlC+EFwZJerZjS3TugJFTFpZaH+r0X7Sh+b0ZBSzV2TEf4DHumWroa5kcz j9N2x+daEJOt7pOSX8+QrDLgyqLz7/bSjGU7AANifYFdLvMQ9WN1JjkaCwN6V1nooAajUB+vwnNRe zeeqyThnqdhszD6vcGNFLV2+4zuFtSQwYsN//cnFsB5bvlwcZBeC8Izqs7+d8fdNmIYTE8AcXayt5 CimyW6LdVp/5blu52OiRAA==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3zKl-0000dd-Ps; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 07:52:04 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 14:51:59 +0200 Message-Id: <834ju3xvyo.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: <83pmczbics.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 04 Dec 2022 11:58:43 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#59803: completion-at-point in shell buffer ignores some files References: <87tu2chhtv.fsf@graner.name> <83pmczbics.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59803 Cc: 59803@debbugs.gnu.org, nicolas@graner.name X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Ping! Stefan, any suggestions or ideas? > Cc: 59803@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 11:58:43 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > From: Nicolas Graner > > Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 12:01:16 +0100 > > > > In a *Shell* buffer, file name completion ignores file names already > > present on the current line. For example, if you have a file named `foo' > > and no other file starting with an f, when you type: > > > > $ cp f f > > > > the first completes `f' to `foo', but the second gives a `No > > match' error. > > > > Similarly, if you have files named foo1, foo2, foo3 and foo4, then: > > > > $ mv foo1 foo2 f > > > > shows only foo3 and foo4 in the completions buffer. > > > > Happens in emacs 29 but not in 28. > > This seems to be due to some changes in pcomplete.el since Emacs 28, because > if you remove pcomplete-completions-at-point from the value of > shell-dynamic-complete-functions, the problem goes away. > > Stefan, can you help here? It sounds like the culprit is some of the > changes in commit 0a36671f41 and/or 88b025f815, but I'm not sure. > > Thanks. > > > > From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 10 16:43:13 2022 Received: (at 59803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2022 21:43:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45233 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p47cn-0006Uj-8D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 16:43:13 -0500 Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:52334) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p47cl-0006Ud-1k for 59803@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2022 16:43:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1670708589; bh=jfn+R+VhdMsDoDc+AHSjprJzE1y4KzgKb2c6wma/2kc=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=h7HSpCymQD27MpGGfTe+pVcBGG92Wcr45SZ+KVBTqEVIFPWyfY3qpU774Duhd4/v6 JaoS5vJ0hajy7sfXRCDPi+HKUp1x+3tp2UgQzPwKuOr5opAlf5GwVkKajnCGxqcmcb eJhDMMbh58D7c0tbRDquWWXEPYHryNMw01yRNqFmoNORH695SHWijUcRrRFPNS0tOr j8ah2uYWqa7uy+ECu7GGH9dRB4vqDwx6AMNjt0A/AC8IDhmH0cy3lLUsDMqfeAtlE+ 5FkAhmQ2Mz4L2GApfsqGkWUAeOfAzpTrJ27iok4wcEDOsYzaaQGua0N6MUhQ6BF4v5 AXZWaikWX+7xA== Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 21:43:09 +0000 From: Gregory Heytings To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#59803: completion-at-point in shell buffer ignores some files In-Reply-To: <834ju3xvyo.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <1a7e3acf355ad17f5a75@heytings.org> References: <87tu2chhtv.fsf@graner.name> <83pmczbics.fsf@gnu.org> <834ju3xvyo.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1v4FN7YbE9" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59803 Cc: Stefan Monnier , 59803@debbugs.gnu.org, nicolas@graner.name X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --1v4FN7YbE9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm not Stefan (alas =F0=9F=98=89), but the culprit is a994126968, and here= 's the=20 fix (a single character change!). > > Ping! Stefan, any suggestions or ideas? > --1v4FN7YbE9 Content-Type: text/x-diff; name=Do-not-pare-arguments-unnecessarily.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <1a7e3acf35e5eb8775ec@heytings.org> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=Do-not-pare-arguments-unnecessarily.patch RnJvbSA3ZGY4NmY3ZGZhYjY5ZGQ2ZmZhMjYyNWJiZTI1ODRkNzBlOWM5MjQy IE1vbiBTZXAgMTcgMDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQ0KRnJvbTogR3JlZ29yeSBIZXl0 aW5ncyA8Z3JlZ29yeUBoZXl0aW5ncy5vcmc+DQpEYXRlOiBTYXQsIDEwIERl YyAyMDIyIDIxOjQwOjMxICswMDAwDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBbUEFUQ0hdIERvIG5v dCBwYXJlIGFyZ3VtZW50cyB1bm5lY2Vzc2FyaWx5Lg0KDQoqIGxpc3AvcGNv bXBsZXRlLmVsIChwY29tcGxldGUtaGVyZS11c2luZy1oZWxwKTogRG8gbm90 IHBhcmUNCmFyZ3VtZW50cy4gIEZpeGVzIGJ1ZyM1OTgwMy4NCi0tLQ0KIGxp c3AvcGNvbXBsZXRlLmVsIHwgMiArLQ0KIDEgZmlsZSBjaGFuZ2VkLCAxIGlu c2VydGlvbigrKSwgMSBkZWxldGlvbigtKQ0KDQpkaWZmIC0tZ2l0IGEvbGlz cC9wY29tcGxldGUuZWwgYi9saXNwL3Bjb21wbGV0ZS5lbA0KaW5kZXggZWYy ODZiNzBmZS4uZTAxZjQyY2ViNCAxMDA2NDQNCi0tLSBhL2xpc3AvcGNvbXBs ZXRlLmVsDQorKysgYi9saXNwL3Bjb21wbGV0ZS5lbA0KQEAgLTE0NTYsNyAr MTQ1Niw3IEBAIHBjb21wbGV0ZS1oZXJlLXVzaW5nLWhlbHANCiAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAocGNvbXBsZXRlLW1hdGNoLXN0cmluZyAx IDApKSkNCiAgICAgICAgICAgKChzdHJpbmctcHJlZml4LXAgIi0iIChwY29t cGxldGUtYXJnIDApKQ0KICAgICAgICAgICAgKHBjb21wbGV0ZS1oZXJlIChh cHBseSAjJ3Bjb21wbGV0ZS1mcm9tLWhlbHAgY29tbWFuZCBhcmdzKSkpDQot ICAgICAgICAgICh0IChwY29tcGxldGUtaGVyZSAocGNvbXBsZXRlLWVudHJp ZXMpKSkpKSkNCisgICAgICAgICAgKHQgKHBjb21wbGV0ZS1oZXJlKiAocGNv bXBsZXRlLWVudHJpZXMpKSkpKSkNCiANCiAocHJvdmlkZSAncGNvbXBsZXRl KQ0KIA0KLS0gDQoyLjM1LjENCg0K --1v4FN7YbE9-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 11 10:06:39 2022 Received: (at 59803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2022 15:06:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4NuZ-0005LA-Gr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 10:06:39 -0500 Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:19680) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4NuX-0005L2-3z for 59803@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 10:06:37 -0500 Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 2BA2E1000FC; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 10:06:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 79B6F1000D2; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 10:06:25 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1670771185; bh=uwZE/7rr5slbefzcuIZ+Vllk81OpYUnGkVOX2trqrHM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=jAbUrucGu9b+EoWv4GC5pGA4Ajg+cgKIpnA3YTE1kMQBCAPgMDaAKqWCFkDLu39os NEO2riLZPN67SCQ18P76ZwWbMQ4l5G+EsttMq9HuyW3BftUHnHSZeCvyPaWuhi7USF 5YCdBKzX3Q/v1DuHfq8BrxzMEu+zIZ2PkoSvtxgOTUIRTXTNrHl/uQp21wCk/fvD2V jdAHr9GLWk8uY5jBOxI9ks9BfQcUUGum0ojInqQV6mMzRH+iWNCCgb9akFfR16SuRC 411Q0nIFaTboHdnDAY6obN34roF4gGYat2IkRLeqxQYTU1PqNASx1oyU+LHmTmm5sm ncN4Ag7QzH9nA== Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.193.52]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3CA9120206; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 10:06:24 -0500 (EST) From: Stefan Monnier To: Gregory Heytings Subject: Re: bug#59803: completion-at-point in shell buffer ignores some files In-Reply-To: <1a7e3acf355ad17f5a75@heytings.org> (Gregory Heytings's message of "Sat, 10 Dec 2022 21:43:09 +0000") Message-ID: References: <87tu2chhtv.fsf@graner.name> <83pmczbics.fsf@gnu.org> <834ju3xvyo.fsf@gnu.org> <1a7e3acf355ad17f5a75@heytings.org> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 10:06:21 -0500 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SPAM-INFO: Spam detection results: 0 ALL_TRUSTED -1 Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP AWL -0.410 Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address BAYES_00 -1.9 Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% DKIM_SIGNED 0.1 Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid DKIM_VALID -0.1 Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature DKIM_VALID_AU -0.1 Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain X-SPAM-LEVEL: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59803 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , nicolas@graner.name, 59803@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > I'm not Stefan (alas =F0=9F=98=89), but the culprit is a994126968, and he= re's the fix > (a single character change!). Not sure how I failed to see your message, but I just tracked the problem to the same source. Thanks, the patch looks just right. Stefan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 11 10:15:26 2022 Received: (at 59803) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2022 15:15:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46565 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4O34-0005Qu-DA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 10:15:26 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47750) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4O33-0005Qj-5H for 59803@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 10:15:25 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4O2t-0006Gp-Tt; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 10:15:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=wUeJEB5cIoPgHqXw7JLNjj45pG2G1jAI0knZbAcMNKQ=; b=sYqPS15u6e2w8QgKlZdc +n5cCFo36VwV8ZV+EgVd4wn4VOCQf7jR7e2LN4GbPBv6Ag/uqmBbeONhBRq9153jLJKJcO58ls3sT BDTXAp66Y9uTqthdI+fZrNT08j5IYzjpOP+s/TdfmKVTbivhxALMoZUbfxtrrWeQ5p9yHzdGaFM0s uM99upNDSNaUaFrYBwIrDy04Ry8QWLItiv2USCfgKp3CZbNO7hg94wID49eanc0MsNKYuP3z3cZZO 2uiDQYQtzHZL3Y05EwqlJ6cBEU27Sx2n1u9dJgk31mfNclIRwFGr/mCzWNZp9b+pI3/LC1DfXVpLb 6TsPUX20Wk2sXw==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p4O2l-0006Y4-2H; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 10:15:14 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 17:15:06 +0200 Message-Id: <83lenet1j9.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sun, 11 Dec 2022 10:06:21 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#59803: completion-at-point in shell buffer ignores some files References: <87tu2chhtv.fsf@graner.name> <83pmczbics.fsf@gnu.org> <834ju3xvyo.fsf@gnu.org> <1a7e3acf355ad17f5a75@heytings.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59803 Cc: gregory@heytings.org, nicolas@graner.name, 59803@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 59803@debbugs.gnu.org, nicolas@graner.name > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 10:06:21 -0500 > > > I'm not Stefan (alas 😉), but the culprit is a994126968, and here's the fix > > (a single character change!). > > Not sure how I failed to see your message, but I just tracked the > problem to the same source. Thanks, the patch looks just right. Gregory, please install on the release branch, and thanks (to both of you). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 11 20:04:47 2022 Received: (at 59803-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2022 01:04:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49259 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4XFP-0005Vy-3a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 20:04:47 -0500 Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:53984) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p4XFM-0005Vs-SI for 59803-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 20:04:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1670807084; bh=5Y0PwmbBOQLz2rLnzXqlqRueCr4iYxSNwVuT/WL28o0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=rNrlRvD+ugeDmHxPNgtwZH/qSnxOguiEsVBJ2pWX4eyJzDbepqntHWN6nAE2Pkk2k 5q8WV2MjIB390splohVdNgf+9BaW2CwzTSTxXBKZdxKn1PxBaJTjRqSRPx13I0KPiv nw3tb2k+AaZm00j0WywWKrwIx6m69ZgVqOmu+CrhdQL5uX5vyEurowWpwQcttACv6Y N9xM/LDfyTt1yomgRyBAlh1PSKEJ+pRcnStxOpkaokwWTLqZt+uxv29Qcg5J+7Nd5j 5G4sh9H5Aqb/njt8wy0l49fvoX+7WUo1ST14hRd+eNHNiQGIX9avbWk9WwcA02yDsd lPCnCIyKXtpLw== Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 01:04:43 +0000 From: Gregory Heytings To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#59803: completion-at-point in shell buffer ignores some files In-Reply-To: <83lenet1j9.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: References: <87tu2chhtv.fsf@graner.name> <83pmczbics.fsf@gnu.org> <834ju3xvyo.fsf@gnu.org> <1a7e3acf355ad17f5a75@heytings.org> <83lenet1j9.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 59803-done Cc: Stefan Monnier , nicolas@graner.name, 59803-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) > > Gregory, please install on the release branch, and thanks (to both of > you). > Done (24c8c28ae6), and closing. From unknown Fri Jun 20 20:02:34 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator