GNU bug report logs - #59789
29.0.50; admin/notes/tree-sitter/html-manual redundant?

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2022 00:10:02 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: confirmed

Found in version 29.0.50

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 29.0.50; admin/notes/tree-sitter/html-manual redundant?
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 16:09:20 -0800

Severity: wishlist

What's the purpose of the admin/notes/tree-sitter/html-manual directory?
The build-manual.sh script seems to just make an HTML export of the
elisp manual, and then copying a few HTML files in place.

I guess it's fine to provide that script, but doesn't it seem redundant
to keep those HTML files updated in git?  Is the idea to ship them with
our release tarball?  We don't do that for other features.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 257 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.