Subject: bug#59745: 26.3; Rename `string-collate-lessp' to respect the convention

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 18:50:21 +0200

tags 59745 wontfix
close 59745
thanks

> From: Drew Adams <[email-masked]>
> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 16:19:31 +0000
> 
> (elisp) `Coding Conventions' tells us:
> 
>    If the purpose of a function is to tell you whether a certain
>    condition is true or false, give the function a name that ends in
>    'p' (which stands for "predicate").  If the name is one word, add
>    just 'p'; if the name is multiple words, add '-p'.  Examples are
>    'framep' and 'frame-live-p'.
> 
> `string-collate-lessp' should, according to convention, be renamed to
> `string-collate-less-p', no?  Every such misnaming encourages others,
> as people tend to base new names on names they see for existing things.

We also have bufferp, stringp etc., so -lessp is not so bad,  especially
since it's modeled on string-lessp.

And anyway, it's too late now for renaming.

Closing.