GNU bug report logs - #59662
29.0.50; [PATCH] Add treesit--indent-defun

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>

Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 19:33:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch

Found in version 29.0.50

Done: Yuan Fu <casouri <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #289 received at 59662 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
Cc: larsi <at> gnus.org, 59662 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, casouri <at> gmail.com,
 monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, dgutov <at> yandex.ru
Subject: Re: bug#59662: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Add treesit--indent-defun
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2022 16:09:09 +0200
> From: Theodor Thornhill <theo <at> thornhill.no>
> Cc: dgutov <at> yandex.ru, larsi <at> gnus.org, 59662 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>  casouri <at> gmail.com, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 22:09:10 +0100
> 
> Something like the patch below?  Forgive me, but my texinfo-fu is
> limited.

You have nothing to worry in that department.

> I'm a little unsure if I xrefed to the correct nodes.  Maybe
> it is better to just mention 'beginning-of-defun' rather than the
> variable 'beginning-of-defun-function'?

I meant a reference to where beginning-of-defun-function is mentioned,
and that is in the ELisp manual.  You can see examples of how to
reference another manual in many places in doc/emacs/*.texi; seartch
for "elisp".

> >> +(defun prog-fill-reindent-defun (&optional argument)
> >> +  "Refill paragraph or reindent the definition that the point is on.
> >> +
> >> +If the point is in a string, or in a comment, or there is a
> >> +comment on the current line, fill the paragraph that the point is
> >> +in or is on the same line.
> >
> > I don't understand the difference between "point is in a string, or in
> > a comment" and "there is a comment on the current line".  
> >
> >> +Otherwise, reindent the definition around or below point."
> >
> > Likewise this one is confusing.
> 
> I'm not sure how to word this differently, but I agree it's a mouthful.

If you explain to me in plain English what you meant, I can suggest a
better wording.

Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 2 years and 158 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.